<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">journal-of-biosciences-and-bioengineering</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Bioengineering</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2836-2535</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Directive Publications</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52338/jobb.2022.1003</article-id>
      <article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A Few Commonly Consumed Beans SDS Page Protein Profiling</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Malaysia</surname>
            <given-names>Sains</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Date</surname>
            <given-names>Received</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub">
        <day>19</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Directive Publications.</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Beans are frequently used to prepare delicious foods and are primarily made of protein. In this study, we investigated the protein content of seven species of regularly consumed beans, including split seeds of Pisum sativum (golden gramme), Arachis hypogaea (peanut), Hoedeum vulgare (barley), Vigna radiata (green bean), Vigna angularis (red bean), and Phaseolus vulgaris (black turtle beans). The proteins were extracted using tris buffer after the beans were all ground into a fine powder. The protein from the beans was separated into similar amounts using SDS-PAGE. Black turtle beans had the highest protein content, whereas golden gramme had the widest range of protein kinds, according to our research. The least amount and variety of proteins were identified in barley. The variation in The protein profiles of the different beans show that while they are all high in protein, they may not all provide the same nutritional benefits for human health. Discussion As a result of their high protein content and widespread use as delegacies over the globe, beans add nutritional value to our diets. The seed coat of the beans washed off by soaking them in water before the protein content of the beans was examined.The beans were then baked to dry them until there was no difference in their dried weight .When compared amongst the 7 beans tested, red beans were shown to have the maximum water absorption capacity, while green gramme was with the lowest water absorption capacity. The difference between the weight before and after drying reflects the water absorption capacity of the beans.Barley has a slightly lower total protein level than other forms of Compared to other beans of comparable weight, barley has a substantially lower protein level. Similar amounts of protein were employed in this study’s SDSPAGE analysis. The electrophoretic migration of the numerous bands varies from bean to bean, despite the fact that the majority of the abundant prote</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <p>Journal on Biotechnology and Bioengineering A Few Commonly Consumed Beans’ SDS-Page Protein Profiling Lay-Harn Gam *Corresponding author Lay-Harn Gam, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Univer- siti Sains Malaysia, Received Date : Aug 25,2022 Accepted Date : Aug 26,2022 Published Date : Sep 26,2022 Abstract Beans are frequently used to prepare delicious foods and are primarily made of protein. In this study, we investigated the protein content of seven species of regularly consumed beans, including split seeds of Pisum sativum (golden gramme), Arachis hypogaea (peanut), Hoedeum vulgare (barley), Vigna radiata (green bean), Vigna angularis (red bean), and Phaseolus vulgaris (black turtle beans). The proteins were extracted using tris buffer after the beans were all ground into a fine powder. The protein from the beans was separated into similar amounts using SDS-PAGE. Black turtle beans had the highest protein content, whereas golden gramme had the widest range of protein kinds, according to our research. The least amount and variety of proteins were identified in barley. The variation in The protein profiles of the different beans show that while they are all high in protein, they may not all provide the same nutritional benefits for human health. Discussion As a result of their high protein content and widespread use as delegacies over the globe, beans add nutritional value to our diets. The seed coat of the beans washed off by soaking them in water before the protein content of the beans was examined.The beans were then baked to dry them until there was no difference in their dried weight .When compared amongst the 7 beans tested, red beans were shown to have the maximum water absorption capacity, while green gramme was with the lowest water absorption capacity. The difference between the weight before and after drying reflects the water absorption capacity of the beans.Barley has a slightly lower total protein level than other forms of Compared to other beans of comparable weight, barley has a substantially lower protein level. Similar amounts of protein were employed in this study’s SDSPAGE analysis. The electrophoretic migration of the numerous bands varies from bean to bean, despite the fact that the majority of the abundant proteins detected in all the beans fell within the range of 37 to 75 kD. This suggested that each bean contained a unique sort of protein. In Diagram 1, lanes 5 and 6 were for green beans and green grammes, respectively.These two beans have the exact same band designs. They belong to the same species, which explains why. Despite the fact that all beans come from seeds, the variations in their protein profiles show that they are composed of various protein subtypes, each of which may have a specific nutritional value that our bodies require. Barley has a lower overall protein level than other forms of beans. According to data from a protein assay, a comparable amount of protein was employed in this study’s SDS-PAGE analysis. We discovered that beans with comparable protein content make for better comparative studies. Conclusion</p>
      <p>For an equivalent dried weight of beans, black turtle beans had the highest protein content whereas barley had the low- est. Among the beans, golden gramme has the widest range of protein. Due to their similar species, green beans and green gramme both have the same type of proteins. Although all beans have proteins, the variation in their protein profiles showed that each bean’s nutritional worth was distinct from that of the others, despite the fact that all beans contain pro- teins. References 1. Kitchen MC. Beans and Seeds 2019 [cited 2019 6 March]. Available from: https://www.Mala ysianchinesekitchen. com/ingredients/beans-and -seeds/. 2. Fraisse JM. Nuts Over Peanut Butter. Star 2.2015. 3. Sheppard A, Rudolf T. Analysis of peanuts and peanut products for total lipids, fatty acids and proximates. Peanut Science. 1991;18(1):51-4. 4. General USPHSOotS. The Surgeon General’s report on nutrition and health: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1988. 5. Curb JD, Wergowske G, Dobbs JC, Abbott RD,Huang B. Serum Lipid Effects of a High–Monounsaturated Fat Open Access 1www.directivepublications.org</p>
      <p>Journal on Biotechnology and Bioengineering Open Access 2www.directivepublications.org Diet Based on Macadamia Nuts. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2000; 160(8):1154-8. 6. Garg ML, Blake RJ, Wills RB, Clayton EH.Macadamia nut consumption modulates favourably risk factors for coronary artery disease in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Lipids. 2007; 42(6):583-7. SDS-Page Protein Profiling of a Few Commonly Consumed Beans 7. Gebauer SK, West SG, Kay CD, Alaupovic P, Bagshaw D, Kris-Etherton PM. Effects of pistachios on cardiovascular disease risk factors and potential mechanisms of action: a doseresponse study. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2008;88(3):651- 9. 8. Broadhurst CL, Polansky MM, Anderson RA. Insulin- like biological activity of culinary and medicinal plant aqueous extracts in vitro. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2000; 48(3):849-52. 9. Tang G-Y, Li X-J, Zhang H-Y. Antidiabetic components contained in vegetables and legumes. Molecules. 2008; 13(5):1189-94. 10. Burks W, Sampson HA, Bannon GA. Peanut allergens. Allergy. 1998; 53(8):725-30. 11. Khare CP. Indian medicinal plants: an illustrated dictionary: Springer Science &amp; Business Media; 2008. 12. Yeşil Y, Akalın E. Folk medicinal plants in Kürecik area (Akçadağ/Malatya Turkey).Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2009;6(3):207-20. 13. Gul S, Ahmed S, Kifli N, Uddin QT, Tahir NB Hussain A, et al. Multiple pathways are responsible for Anti-inflammatory and Cardiovascular activities of Hordeum vulgare L. Journal of translational medicine. 2014; 12(1):316. 14. Marwat S, Hashimi M, Khan K. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) A prophetic food mentioned in Ahadith and its ethnobotanical importance. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2012; 12(7):835-41. 15. Adhikari BM, Bajracharya A, Shrestha AK. Comparison of nutritional properties of Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) flour with wheat and barley flours. Food science &amp; nutrition.2016;4(1):119-24. 16. Qasim M, Khalid M, Sayyed A, Din I, Hayat K, Jan SA. Phytochemical potentials and medicinal uses of twenty-four selected medicinal plants from Swabi, Pakistan. Journal of Rural Development and Agriculture. 2016;1(1):49-58. 17. Min L. Research advance in chemical composion and pharmacological action of mung bean. Shanghai J Trad Chin Med. 2001; 5:18. 18. Randhir R, Lin Y-T, Shetty K. Stimulation of phenolics, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities in dark germinated mung bean sprouts in response to peptide and phytochemical elicitors. Process Biochemistry. 2004;39 (5):637-46. 19. Yao Y, Chen F, Wang M, Wang J, Ren G. Antidiabetic activity of Mung bean extracts in diabetic KK-Ay mice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;56(19):8869-73. 20. Vanamala J, Reddivari L, Yoo KS, Pike LM, Patil BS. Variation in the content of bioactive flavonoids in different brands of orange and grapefruit juices. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2006; 19(2- 3):157-66. 21. Anjum NA, Umar S, Iqbal M, Khan NA. Cadmium causes oxidative stress in mung bean by affecting the antioxidant enzyme system and ascorbate-glutathione cycle metabolism. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2011; 58(1):92-9. 22. Kanatt SR, Arjun K, Sharma A. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of legume hulls. Food Research International. 2011; 44(10):3182-7. 23. Li S. Part of cereals. Ben-Cao-Gang-Mu Beijing: People’s Hygiene Publishing. 1999:1344-9. 24. Durak A, Baraniak B, Jakubczyk A, Świeca M.Biologically active peptides obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis of Adzuki bean seeds.Food chemistry. 2013;141(3):2177- 83. 25. Livestrong. Cooking Beans and Legumes 2019 [cited 2019 6 March]. Available from: https://www.livestrong.</p>
      <p>Journal on Biotechnology and Bioengineering Open Access 3www.directivepublications.org com/article/261095-how-to-cook-yellow-split-peas/. 26. Nadkarni KM. [Indian materia medica]; Dr. KM Nadkarni’s Indian materia medica: with Ayurvedic, Unani-Tibbi, Siddha, allopathic, homeopathic, naturopathic &amp; home remedies,appendices &amp; indexes. 1: Popular Prakashan;1996. 27. Chopra R, Nayar S, Chopra I. Glossary of indian medicinal plants, publication and information directorate. CSIR New Delhi. 1992:132-210. 28. Rubio LA, Pérez A, Ruiz R, Guzmán MÁ,Aranda-Olmedo I, Clemente A.Characterization of pea (Pisum sativum) seed protein fractions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2014; 94(2):280-7. 29. Borah P. 6 Best Black Bean Recipe | Easy Black Bean Recipes: NDTV; 2019 [Available from: https://food. ndtv.com/lists/5-best-blackbean-recipes-1634986. 30. Bennink M. Consumption of black beans and navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) reduced azoxymethane- induced colon cancer in rats.Nutrition and cancer. 2002;44(1):60-5. 31. Aparicio-Fernández X, García-Gasca T, Yousef GG, Lila MA, González de Mejia E, LoarcaPina G. Chemopreventive activity of polyphenolics from black Jamapa bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on HeLa and HaCaT cells. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2006; 54(6):2116-22. 32. Takeoka GR, Dao LT, Full GH, Wong RY, Harden LA, Edwards RH, et al. Characterization of black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) anthocyanins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1997;45(9):3395- 400.SDS-Page Protein Profiling of a Few Commonly Consumed Beans 33. Xu B, Chang S. Total phenolic content and antioxidant properties of eclipse black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by processing methods. Journal of food science.2008; 73(2):H19-H27. 34. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacterio phage T4. Nature. 1970; 227(5259):680-5. 35. He F. Laemmli-SDS-PAGE. Bio-protocol. 2011; 1(11):e80.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>
