<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">annals-of-radiology</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Annals of Radiology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2836-2470</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Directive Publications</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52338/aor.2022.1002</article-id>
      <article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Myocardial Injury After COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Myocarditis: Natural History</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Centre</surname>
            <given-names>Stephenson Cardiac Imaging</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Institute</surname>
            <given-names>Libin Cardiovascular</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub">
        <day>19</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Directive Publications.</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Background : An uncommon side effect of the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine is acute myocarditis. The natural history of this problem is poorly understood. Methods : In 20 consecutive patients meeting the criteria, baseline and convalescent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging evaluations were carried out. current Lake Louise mRNA-based vaccination criteria within 10 days of acute myocarditis. Between baseline and convalescence, CMR-based changes in left ventricular volumes, mass, ejection fraction (LVEF), tissue inflammation markers (native T1 and T2 mapping), and fibrosis markers (late gadolinium enhancement [LGE] and extracellular volume [ECV]) were evaluated. Clinical results and cardiac symptoms were recorded. Conclusions : Beyond three months of recovery in this young patient group, COVID-19 mRNA vaccineeassociated myocarditis demonstrated rapid improvements in CMR- based indices of edoema, contractile function, and overall LGE burden. However, regional fibrosis after edoema resolution was frequently seen, which supported the need for continuous observation. Methods Within 10 days of getting an mRNA-based test, 20 adult patients (age 18) were diagnosed with acute myocarditis. From June 2021 to December 2021, people received the COVID-19 vaccine. Patients had to meet CMR-based diagnostic criteria for acute myocarditis by the Updated Lake Louise Criteria and have a high clinical suspicion of acute myocarditis based on the Diagnostic Criteria of the European Society of Cardiology20. 14 All participants underwent baseline blood sampling, 12-lead electrocardiography, chest X-rays, and clinical evaluations in addition to CMR imaging. A thorough health questionnaire was filled out, covering demographics, current heart symptoms, inflammatory disease history from the past, and concomitant conditions. After at least three months after recuperation, patients were then required to go through another CMR imaging, fill out questionnaires, and</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <p>Background : An uncommon side effect of the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine is acute myocarditis. The natural history of this problem is poorly understood. Methods : In 20 consecutive patients meeting the criteria, baseline and convalescent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging evaluations were carried out. current Lake Louise mRNA-based vaccination criteria within 10 days of acute myocarditis. Between baseline and convalescence, CMR-based changes in left ventricular volumes, mass, ejection fraction (LVEF), tissue inflammation markers (native T1 and T2 mapping), and fibrosis markers (late gadolinium enhancement [LGE] and extracellular volume [ECV]) were evaluated. Clinical results and cardiac symptoms were recorded. Conclusions : Beyond three months of recovery in this young patient group, COVID-19 mRNA vaccineeassociated myocarditis demonstrated rapid improvements in CMRbased indices of edoema, contractile function, and overall LGE burden.</p>
      <p>However, regional fibrosis after edoema resolution was frequently seen, which supported the need for continuous observation. Methods Within 10 days of getting an mRNA-based test, 20 adult patients (age 18) were diagnosed with acute myocarditis. From June 2021 to December 2021, people received the COVID-19 vaccine. Patients had to meet CMR-based diagnostic criteria for acute myocarditis by the Updated Lake Louise Criteria and have a high clinical suspicion of acute myocarditis based on the Diagnostic Criteria of the European Society of Cardiology20. 14 All participants underwent baseline blood sampling, 12-lead electrocardiography, chest X-rays, and clinical evaluations in addition to CMR imaging. A thorough health questionnaire was filled out, covering demographics, current heart symptoms, inflammatory disease history from the past, and concomitant conditions.</p>
      <p>After at least three months after recuperation, patients were then required to go through another CMR imaging, fill out questionnaires, and have their medical records reviewed. InformedUnder the Cardiovascular Imaging Registry of Calgary, patient permission was sought (CIROC; NCT04367220). 3 Tesla scanners were used for CMR imaging (Prisma or Skyra, Siemens Healthineers). The imaging procedure included native T1 mapping using a modified lock-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) technique, T2 mapping using a T2-prepared gradient echo technique, black blood T2-weighted imaging using a spectral presaturation attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) technique, and black blood T2-weighted imaging prior to contrast infusion of 0.15 mmol/kg gadolinium (Gadovist, Bayer). Ten minutes following the delivery of contrast, shortand long-axis images of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging were obtained using a phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) pulse sequence, followed by repeated T1 mapping to determine the extracellular volume (ECV).</p>
      <p>Conclusion The COVID-19 mRNA vaccineeassociated myocarditis showed rapid improvements in CMR-based indicators of edoema, contractile function, and overall LGE load after three months of recovery in this young patient cohort. Regional fibrosis, however, was frequently observed following edoema resolution, supporting the necessity for ongoing surveillance.</p>
      <p>REFERENCES</p>
      <p>1. Bloomberg. Covid-19 tracker. Available at: https:// www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-trackerglobal-distribution/.</p>
      <p>2. Abu Mouch S, Roguin A, Hellou E, et al. Myocarditis following Covid19 mRNA vaccination. Vaccine 2021;39:3790-3.</p>
      <p>3. Kim RJ, Kim HW, Jenista ER, et al. Patients with acute myocarditis following mrna covid-19 vaccination. JAMA Cardiol 2021;6:1196-201.</p>
      <p>4. Ryan M, Montgomery J, Engler R, et al. Myocarditis following immunization with mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in members of the us military. JAMA Cardiol 2021;6:1202-6.</p>
      <p>5. Patel YR, Louis DW, Atalay M, Agarwal S, Shah NR. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in young adult patients with acute myocarditis following mRNA Covid-19 vaccination: a case series.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2021;23:1-8.</p>
      <p>6. Shaw KE, Cavalcante JL, Han BK, Gössl M. Possible associationbetweenCovid-19vaccineandmyocarditis: clinical and CMR findings. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14:1856-61.</p>
      <p>7. Rosner CM, Genovese L, Tehrani BN, et al. Myocarditis temporally associated with Covid-19 vaccination. Circulation 2021;10:1-9.</p>
      <p>8. David Hana KP, Sherif Roman BG, Sofka S. Clinical cardiovascular adverse events reported posteCovid-19 vaccination: are they a real risk? Curr Probl Cardiol 2022;47:101077.</p>
      <p>9. Diaz GA, Parsons GT, Gering SK, Meier AR, Hutchinson RAIV.Myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination for Covid-19. JAMA 2021;326:1210-2.</p>
      <p>10. Simone A, Herald J, Chen A, et al. Acute myocarditis following Covid-19 mRNA vaccination in adults aged 18 years or older. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181:1668-70.</p>
      <p>11. Oster ME, Shay DK, Su JR, et al. Myocarditis cases reported after mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccination in the US from December 2020 to August 2021. JAMA 2022;327:331-40.</p>
      <p>12. Fazlollahi A, Zahmatyar M, Noori M, et al. Cardiac complications following mRNA Covid-19 vaccines: a systematic review of case reports and case series. Rev Med Virol 2022;32:e2318.</p>
      <p>13. Tijmes FS, Thavendiranathan P, Udell JA, Seidman M, Hanneman K.Cardiac mri assessment of nonischemic myocardial inflammation: Stateof the art review and update on myocarditis associated with covid-19 vaccination. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2021;3:e210252.</p>
      <p>14. Ferreira VM, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, et al. Cardiovascularm magnetic resonance in nonischemic myocardial inflammation: expert recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:3158-76.</p>
      <p>15. Luetkens JA, Homsi R, Dabir D, et al. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance for short-term followup in acute myocarditis. J Am Heartm Assoc 2016;5:e003603.</p>
      <p>16. Pollack A, Kontorovich AR, Fuster V, Dec GW. Viral myocarditisddiagnosis, treatment options, and current controversies. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015;12:670- 80.</p>
      <p>17. Bohnen S, Radunski UK, Lund GK, et al. Tissue characterisation by T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to monitormyocardial inflammation in healing myocarditis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18:744-51.</p>
      <p>18. VonKnobelsdorff-BrenkenhoffF,SchülerJ,Dogangüzel S, et al.Detection and monitoring of acute myocarditis applying quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10: 1-10.</p>
      <p>19. Bozkurt B, Kamat I, Hotez PJ. Myocarditis with Covid-19 mRNA accines. Circulation 2021 2019:471-84.</p>
      <p>20. CaforioALP,PankuweitS,ArbustiniE,etal.Currentstate of knowledge on etiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2636-48.</p>
      <p>21. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, et al. Standardised image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonanced2020 update: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardised Post-Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020;22:19</p>
      <p>22. Kawel-Boehm N, Maceira A, Valsangiacomo-Buechel ER, et al. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:29.</p>
      <p>23. Witberg G, Barda N, Hoss S, et al. Myocarditis after Covid-19 vaccination in a large health care organisation. N Engl J Med 2021;385:2132-9.</p>
      <p>24. Gellad WF. Myocarditis after vaccination against Covid-19. BMJ 2021;375:n3090.</p>
      <p>25. Mevorach D, Anis E, Cedar N, et al. Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against Covid-19 in Israel. N Engl J Med 2021;385:2140-9.</p>
      <p>26. Dionne A, Sperotto F, Chamberlain S, et al. Association of myocarditis with BNT162b2 messenger RNA Covid-19 vaccine in a case series of children. JAMA Cardiol 2021;6:1446-50.</p>
      <p>27. Fronza M, Thavendiranathan P, Chan V, et al. Myocardial injury pattern at MRI in COVID-19 vaccineassociated myocarditis. Radiology</p>
      <p>28. Sanguineti F, Garot P, Mana M, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance predictors of clinical outcome in patients with suspected acute myocarditis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:78.</p>
      <p>29. Gräni C, Eichhorn C, Bière L, et al. Prognostic Value of cardiac magnetic resonance tissue characterisation in risk stratifying patients with suspected myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1964-76.</p>
      <p>30. Aquaro GD, Perfetti M, Camastra G, et al. Cardiac MR with late gadolinium enhancement in acute myocarditis with preserved systolic function: ITAMY study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1977-87.</p>
      <p>31. Bozkurt B, Colvin M, Cook J, et al. Current diagnostic and treatment strategies for specific dilated cardiomyopathies: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016;134:e579-646.</p>
      <p>32. Cavalcante J, Shaw K, Gössl M, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging midterm follow up of Covid-19 vaccineeassociated myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15:1821-182.</p>
      <p>33. White JA, Hansen R, Abdelhaleem A, et al. Natural history of myocardial injury and chamber remodelling in acute myocarditis: a 12-month prospective cohort study using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:e008614.</p>
      <p>34. Grun S, Schumm J, Greulich S, et al. Long-term followup of biopsyproven viral myocarditis: predictors of mortality and incomplete recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1604-15.</p>
      <p>35. Ammirati E, Frigerio M, Adler ED, et al. Management of acute myocarditis and chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy: an expert consensus document. Circ Heart Fail 2020;13:e007405.</p>
      <p>36. Luk A, Clarke B, Dahdah N, et al. Myocarditis and pericarditis after Covid-19 mRNA vaccination: practical considerations for care providers.Can J Cardiol 2021;37:1629-34. 2022;304:553-62</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>
