<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="case-report" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">journal-of-clinical-obstetrics-and-gynecology-research</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2766-2756</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Directive Publications</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52338/jocogr.2026.5771</article-id>
      <article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Case report</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Postpartum Diagnostic Trap: RCVS-PRES Spectrum Disorder Masquerading As Post-Dural Puncture Headache Following Elective LSCS</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Khan</surname>
            <given-names>Shazia</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, INHS Asvini, Colaba, Mumbai, India</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Krishnamurthy</surname>
            <given-names>Aparna</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, INHS Asvini, Colaba, Mumbai, India</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Mukherjee</surname>
            <given-names>Arindam</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Medicine, INHS Asvini, Colaba, Mumbai, India</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Girdhar</surname>
            <given-names>Sachin</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Radiodiagnosis, INHS Asvini, Colaba, Mumbai, India</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Grewal</surname>
            <given-names>Roobina</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, INHS Asvini, Colaba, Mumbai, India</aff>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub">
        <day>10</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></date>
        <date date-type="accepted"><day>02</day><month>06</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Directive Publications.</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Headache following caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia is a common postoperative complaint and is most frequently attributed to post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). However, clinicians must remain vigilant for secondary neurological causes - particularly when symptoms evolve atypically or fail to respond to conservative measures. These include postpartum eclampsia, Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome (RCVS), and Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES). We present a case of a 30-year-old multiparous woman who developed persistent headache following an elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) under spinal anaesthesia. Initially managed as PDPH, her clinical course was complicated by progressive bradycardia, acute-onset hypertension, visual disturbances, and ultimately a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. Brain MRI confirmed RCVS-PRES spectrum disorder with characteristic patchy T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in bilateral parieto-occipital regions, posterior cingulate gyrus, and bilateral lentiform nuclei. The final diagnosis was postpartum eclampsia concurrent with RCVS-PRES spectrum disorder. Multidisciplinary management with magnesium sulphate, intravenous labetalol, levetiracetam, and nimodipine resulted in complete neurological recovery and safe discharge. This case underscores the critical importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for overlapping neurological entities in any postpartum patient with refractory headache.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <kwd>RCVS</kwd>
        <kwd>PRES</kwd>
        <kwd>Postpartum eclampsia</kwd>
        <kwd>Post-dural puncture headache</kwd>
        <kwd>Spinal anaesthesia</kwd>
        <kwd>LSCS</kwd>
        <kwd>Postpartum headache</kwd>
        <kwd>Cerebral vasoconstriction</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <p>INTRODUCTION Postpartum headache is a frequent clinical challenge encountered in obstetric and anaesthetic practice. In the setting of neuraxial anaesthesia, PDPH remains the leading diagnosis and is attributed to inadvertent or intended dural</p>
      <p>ecology, INHS Asvini, Colaba, Mumbai – 400005, India.</p>
      <p>May-2026 ; Reviewed: 02-June-2026, QC No. JOCOGR - 5771 ;</p>
      <p>sorder Masquerading As Post-Dural Puncture Headache Following Elective Lscs. 0.52338/jocogr.2026.5771. nder the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, operly cited.</p>
      <p>Dr. Shazia Khan</p>
      <p>puncture, leading to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and intracranial hypotension [1]. However, secondary causes may account for up to 40% of severe postpartum headaches, and these include potentially life-threatening conditions such as eclampsia, PRES, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), subarachnoid haemorrhage, and RCVS [2,3]. Reversible</p>
      <p>Cerebral</p>
      <p>Vasoconstriction</p>
      <p>Syndrome</p>
      <p>(RCVS)</p>
      <p>is an increasingly recognised condition characterised by multifocal, segmental narrowing of cerebral arteries that typically resolves over days to weeks. Its hallmark clinical feature is recurrent thunderclap headache, but it may also manifest with focal neurological deficits, seizures, stroke, or visual disturbances. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome</p>
      <p>(PRES)</p>
      <p>represents</p>
      <p>neuroradiological</p>
      <p>and</p>
      <p>clinical syndrome characterised by vasogenic oedema predominantly in posterior cerebral regions, associated with acute hypertension, seizures, encephalopathy, and visual symptoms [4]. Crucially, RCVS and PRES are not mutually exclusive — emerging evidence highlights a spectrum of overlapping pathophysiology involving shared endothelial dysfunction and cerebral autoregulatory failure, especially in the postpartum period [5]. The postpartum state itself is a recognised trigger for both RCVS and PRES, likely mediated by hormonal flux, haemodynamic shifts, sympathetic surges, and circulating vasoactive substances. The added variable of spinal anaesthesia — which alters CSF dynamics, sympathetic tone, and cerebrovascular reactivity — may further predispose susceptible individuals to these phenomena [6]. We report a rare case in which postpartum eclampsia with concurrent RCVS–PRES spectrum disorder initially mimicked PDPH, resulting in a delayed but ultimately successful diagnosis and recovery.</p>
      <p>CASE PRESENTATION Patient Profile and Initial Presentation A 30-year-old woman (P2L2) with no known antepartum comorbidities was admitted for elective LSCS. She had no prior history of hypertension, pre-eclampsia, renal disease, or neurological illness. The procedure was performed under standard spinal anaesthesia with an uneventful intraoperative course. There were no documented complications at the time of dural puncture and no abnormalities were noted in the immediate post-anaesthetic recovery period. On postoperative day 1, the patient began complaining of persistent headache. At this stage, vital signs remained stable and there were no focal neurological deficits. Given the recent spinal anaesthesia, a provisional diagnosis of PDPH was made, and she was managed conservatively with intravenous hydration, oral analgesics, and close observation. The headache failed to demonstrate the characteristic postural</p>
      <p>variation expected in PDPH — notably, it was not relieved by recumbency — and showed no symptomatic improvement over the subsequent 48 hours. Clinical Deterioration On postoperative day 3, a new and unexplained finding emerged: the patient developed significant bradycardia with a pulse rate of 40–44 beats per minute. Blood pressure at this point remained within the normal range, and oxygen saturation was maintained between 92–95% on room air. A 12-lead ECG confirmed sinus bradycardia with no evidence of heart block or ischaemic changes. Two-dimensional echocardiography</p>
      <p>(2D</p>
      <p>ECHO)</p>
      <p>and</p>
      <p>contrast-enhanced</p>
      <p>computed tomography (CECT) of the chest and abdomen revealed no structural or pulmonary pathology. The aetiology of the bradycardia remained unexplained at this stage and, in retrospect, may have represented an early autonomic manifestation of evolving cerebral dysregulation. By postoperative day 5, the clinical picture had escalated substantially. The patient developed acute blurring of vision alongside a sharp rise in blood pressure to 160/100 mmHg. Notably, urine spot protein was negative, and all routine blood investigations — including full blood count, renal and liver function tests, and coagulation profile — remained within normal limits. Given the constellation of persistent headache, visual disturbance, and new-onset hypertension in the postpartum setting, a clinical diagnosis of postpartum eclampsia was entertained. Magnesium sulphate infusion was commenced according to the Zuspan regimen, and intravenous labetalol 20 mg was administered as a stat dose for acute blood pressure control. Despite these measures, at 11:00 hours the patient experienced a single episode of generalized tonic-clonic seizure, following which she was emergently transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for close monitoring and further management. Neuroimaging and Final Diagnosis Urgent MRI of the brain was performed and demonstrated patchy areas of T2/FLAIR hyperintensity involving the grey matter of bilateral parieto-occipital regions, the posterior aspect of the cingulate gyrus, bilateral lentiform nuclei, and the body of the right caudate nucleus. These findings were consistent with vasogenic oedema in a distribution characteristic of PRES (Fig 1). The co-occurrence of clinical features of cerebral vasoconstriction — in a postpartum patient without prior hypertension, presenting with headache, seizure, and visual disturbance — established the final diagnosis of Postpartum Eclampsia with RCVS–PRES Spectrum Disorder.</p>
      <p>Dr. Shazia Khan</p>
      <p>Figure 1.</p>
      <p>Treatment and Outcome In the ICU, the patient was continued on magnesium sulphate infusion at 1 g/hour for seizure prophylaxis, supplemental oxygen, and intravenous antibiotics to prevent nosocomial infection. Intravenous levetiracetam was initiated for seizure control and subsequently transitioned to oral therapy. Nimodipine, a selective calcium channel blocker with established efficacy in cerebral vasospasm, was added to address the vasoconstriction component of RCVS. The patient showed progressive clinical improvement: blood pressure normalised, visual symptoms fully resolved, and no further seizure activity was recorded. She was successfully discharged in a stable neurological condition.</p>
      <p>DISCUSSION Diagnostic Transitions and Clinical Learning Points This case illustrates a challenging sequence of diagnostic transitions that are instructive for both obstetricians and anaesthesiologists. The initial presentation was entirely consistent with PDPH — a well-recognised complication following spinal anaesthesia. However, several atypical features should have prompted earlier re-evaluation. The</p>
      <p>headache lacked postural character, was unresponsive to conservative therapy, and was later accompanied by neurological symptoms absent in PDPH. The principle that headache following neuraxial anaesthesia is PDPH until proven otherwise is clinically convenient but potentially dangerous, particularly when warning signs evolve. Postpartum eclampsia, which accounts for 20–30% of all eclamptic seizures, is well recognised to occur without antecedent hypertension or proteinuria during the antenatal period, as observed in this patient. The classical prodrome of persistent headache, followed by visual disturbance, acute hypertension, and finally seizure — though temporally extended over five days in this case — mirrors the established pathophysiological cascade. The absence of proteinuria does not exclude the diagnosis, as endothelial dysfunction and cerebral autoregulatory failure can manifest independently of renal proteinuria [6,7]. The concurrent identification of RCVS–PRES spectrum disorder reflects the growing recognition that these are not isolated entities but rather interrelated expressions of a common pathophysiological substrate. RCVS is characterised by reversible segmental cerebral arterial vasoconstriction with clinical improvement over weeks [8]. PRES reflects the</p>
      <p>Dr. Shazia Khan</p>
      <p>downstream consequence of failed cerebral autoregulation — when arterial pressure overwhelms the vasculature&apos;s protective vasoconstriction, breakthrough hyperperfusion and vasogenic oedema ensue. In the postpartum setting, both are driven by hormonal changes, heightened sympathetic activity, and circulating vasoactive mediators including endothelin-1 and serotonin [9,10]. Role of Spinal Anaesthesia The potential contributory role of spinal anaesthesia in precipitating</p>
      <p>unmasking</p>
      <p>RCVS–PRES</p>
      <p>susceptible</p>
      <p>individuals deserves consideration. Subarachnoid injection alters CSF pressure dynamics acutely, and compensatory cerebrovascular responses to these shifts may trigger vasoreactivity in predisposed vessels [11]. Additionally, the acute sympatholysis following spinal block, and subsequent rebound sympathetic surge during recovery, may contribute</p>
      <p>Table 1. Summary of the key differentiating features betwe</p>
      <p>neuroimaging, and management — highlighting their overlappi Feature</p>
      <p>Postpartum RCVS</p>
      <p>CLINICAL FEATURES Headache</p>
      <p>Thunderclap; recurrent, severe Hallmark f</p>
      <p>Seizures</p>
      <p>Less common (~20–30%) Seen in severe ca</p>
      <p>Visual symptoms</p>
      <p>Transient blurring, scotomata Intermittent</p>
      <p>Hypertension</p>
      <p>Variable; may be absent Not required for d</p>
      <p>Encephalopathy</p>
      <p>Uncommon unless stroke complicates Rar</p>
      <p>Proteinuria</p>
      <p>Absent Not a feature</p>
      <p>Postpartum onset</p>
      <p>Days to 4 weeks Peak: week 1–2</p>
      <p>Course</p>
      <p>Monophasic; resolves over weeks General</p>
      <p>IMAGING FINDINGS MRI T2/FLAIR</p>
      <p>Often normal early May show cortical SAH</p>
      <p>Distribution</p>
      <p>Anterior &gt; posterior Territorial if infarct pr</p>
      <p>DWI / ADC</p>
      <p>Restricted diffusion if ischaemic stroke DW dark</p>
      <p>MRA / CTA</p>
      <p>Multifocal segmental vasoconstriction &quot;Str pattern</p>
      <p>DSA (angiography)</p>
      <p>Definitive; confirms reversible vasocon standard</p>
      <p>Haemorrhage</p>
      <p>Cortical SAH, lobar ICH possible Significan risk</p>
      <p>MRI enhancement</p>
      <p>No parenchymal enhancement Typically a</p>
      <p>Imaging reversibility</p>
      <p>Vasoconstriction resolves in 4–12 week follow-up MRA</p>
      <p>PATHOPHYSIOLOGY &amp; MANAGEMENT Core mechanism</p>
      <p>Segmental cerebral arterial vasospasm Vasoconstriction predominates</p>
      <p>to the haemodynamic instability that predisposes cerebral autoregulatory failure. The unexplained bradycardia observed on day 3 may have represented an aberrant autonomic response within this context [12]. Differential Diagnosis and Exclusion The differential diagnosis for this presentation was broad and included PDPH, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), intracranial haemorrhage, meningitis, and isolated PRES or RCVS. CT brain and CT angiography excluded haemorrhagic stroke and significant cerebral venous pathology [13,14]. The characteristic MRI pattern of posterior predominant vasogenic oedema without diffusion restriction, in the context of postpartum onset, acute hypertension, seizure, and clinical recovery with appropriate therapy, cemented the RCVS–PRES diagnosis (Table1) [15].</p>
      <p>een postpartum RCVS and PRES across clinical presentation,</p>
      <p>ing spectrum. Postpartum PRES</p>
      <p>feature</p>
      <p>Diffuse, progressive; less abrupt Often gradual onset</p>
      <p>ases</p>
      <p>Prominent (~60–75%) Often the presenting feature</p>
      <p>Cortical blindness, hemianopia Prominent feature</p>
      <p>diagnosis</p>
      <p>Typically severe (&gt;160/110 mmHg) Usually present</p>
      <p>Confusion, drowsiness, agitation Common</p>
      <p>lly benign</p>
      <p>Variable; present if eclampsia overlap absent</p>
      <p>May be</p>
      <p>Usually within 48–72 hours Peak: first 24–72 hrs Resolves days–weeks with treatment Reversible</p>
      <p>H or infarct later</p>
      <p>Patchy hyperintensity in parieto-occipital regions Hallmark finding</p>
      <p>resent</p>
      <p>Posterior predominant Parieto-occipital, cerebellar, lentiform nuclei</p>
      <p>WI bright / ADC Facilitated diffusion (vasogenic oedema) DWI dark / ADC bright</p>
      <p>ring-and-beads&quot; Usually normal vessels Vascular imaging unaffected</p>
      <p>nstriction Gold Typically normal; not required Not a routine investigation</p>
      <p>nt complication Rare haemorrhagic transformation Uncommon</p>
      <p>absent</p>
      <p>Leptomeningeal enhancement in some cases Occasional finding</p>
      <p>ks Confirm on Oedema resolves in days–weeks Confirm on followup MRI Failed cerebrovascular autoregulation Vasogenic oedema from hyperperfusion</p>
      <p>Dr. Shazia Khan</p>
      <p>CSF findings</p>
      <p>Normal or mildly elevated protein Near normal</p>
      <p>Key treatment</p>
      <p>Nimodipine (calcium channel blocker) Avoid vasoconstrictors and triptans</p>
      <p>Prognosis</p>
      <p>Good; stroke risk if untreated Vigilance for</p>
      <p>CONCLUSION This</p>
      <p>case</p>
      <p>powerfully</p>
      <p>demonstrates</p>
      <p>that</p>
      <p>persistent</p>
      <p>postpartum headache following spinal anaesthesia must not be reflexively attributed to PDPH. A thorough, dynamic clinical re-evaluation is essential whenever headache proves refractory to conservative management, lacks typical postural characteristics, or is accompanied by any neurological symptom — however subtle. The triad of headache, visual disturbance, and hypertension in the postpartum period must raise urgent suspicion for eclampsia and RCVS–PRES spectrum disorder. Timely</p>
      <p>neuroimaging</p>
      <p>particularly</p>
      <p>MRI</p>
      <p>with</p>
      <p>FLAIR</p>
      <p>sequences — is essential for diagnosis when secondary causes are suspected. Early administration of magnesium sulphate for seizure prophylaxis and prevention of cerebral vasospasm,</p>
      <p>combined</p>
      <p>with</p>
      <p>targeted</p>
      <p>antihypertensive</p>
      <p>therapy and calcium channel blockers such as nimodipine to address vasoconstriction, represents the cornerstone of management. Multidisciplinary collaboration between obstetrics, anaesthesiology, neurology, and critical care is vital in navigating these complex presentations. As RCVS–PRES spectrum disorder becomes increasingly recognised in the postpartum population, awareness among frontline clinicians must keep pace. The maternal outcome in this case was excellent precisely because the diagnosis was ultimately made and treatment escalated appropriately. Vigilance, clinical flexibility, and a willingness to look beyond the most common diagnosis remain the most powerful tools in postpartum neurological care. Acknowledgements Nil Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.</p>
      <p>REFERENCES 1.</p>
      <p>Joudi N, Ansari J. Postpartum headaches after epidural or spinal anesthesia. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 01;33(2):94-99</p>
      <p>Goldszmidt E, Kern R, Chaput A, Macarthur A. The incidence and etiology of postpartum headaches: a prospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;52(9):971-7.</p>
      <p>Normal Not diagnostic BP control: labetalol, hydralazine Magnesium sulphate if eclampsia co-exists</p>
      <p>r complications</p>
      <p>Excellent with treatment Rare recurrence</p>
      <p>Khoromi S. Secondary headaches in pregnancy and the puerperium. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1239078</p>
      <p>Chen SP, Wang SJ. Pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. J Biomed Sci. 2022 Sep 21;29(1):72</p>
      <p>Jeanneret V, Jillella DV, Rangaraju S, et al. PRES and RCVS: Two Distinct Entities or a Spectrum of the Same Disease?. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;31(6):106472. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106472</p>
      <p>American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational</p>
      <p>hypertension</p>
      <p>and</p>
      <p>preeclampsia.</p>
      <p>ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 222. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(6):e237–e260. 7.</p>
      <p>Stella CL, Jodicke CD, How HY, Harkness UF, Sibai BM. Postpartum headache: is your work-up complete? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(4):318.e1–318.e7.</p>
      <p>Sveinsson O, Love Á, Vilmarsson V, Olafsson I. [Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome - a common cause of thunderclap headache]. Laeknabladid. 2020 Feb;106(2):79-83</p>
      <p>Fugate</p>
      <p>JE,</p>
      <p>Rabinstein</p>
      <p>AA.</p>
      <p>Posterior</p>
      <p>reversible</p>
      <p>encephalopathy syndrome: clinical and radiological manifestations,</p>
      <p>pathophysiology,</p>
      <p>and</p>
      <p>outstanding</p>
      <p>questions. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(9):914–925. 10. Bartynski WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome,</p>
      <p>Part</p>
      <p>controversies</p>
      <p>surrounding</p>
      <p>pathophysiology of vasogenic edema. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(6):1043–1049 11. Safran SL, Balmer C, Savoldelli G. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome during caesarean section. BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Dec 5;12(12):e230606. doi: 10.1136/ bcr-2019-230606. 12. Doelakeh ES, Chandak A. Risk Factors in Administering Spinal Anesthesia: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2023 Dec 4;15(12):e49886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49886.</p>
      <p>Dr. Shazia Khan</p>
      <p>13. Perillo T, Paolella C, Perrotta G, Serino A, Caranci F, Manto A. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: review of neuroimaging findings. Radiol Med. 2022 Sep;127(9):981-990 14. Ducros A, Boukobza M, Porcher R, Sarov M, Valade D, Bousser MG. The clinical and radiological spectrum of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. A prospective series of 67 patients. Brain. 2007 Dec;130(Pt 12):3091-101 15. Bartynski WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, Part 1: fundamental imaging and clinical features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(6):1036–1042</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>
