Author Login

Correspondence to Author: Jessie EM 

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA

Abstract:

Evidence-based clinical pointers ar necessary tools in increasing the standard of nurses' clinical observe. Hence, this study aimed to analyze the standard of evidence-based clinical pointers from the nurses’ read. Methods: during this descriptive cross sectional study, 116 nurses were collected through census methodology from the medical aid units of 1 of the chosen hospitals in Iranian capital in 2010. For knowledge assortment, a researcher-made form was applied. Face validity was examined by nurses and content validity by college members and also the reliableness of the check was confirmed by check retest furthermore as McNemar and Spearman tests (r=0.72). the info were analyzed by SPSS seventeen applied math package victimization descriptive-analytical strategies. Results: the sole vital relationship was ascertained between legal status and also the guideline quality score (p=0.04). % 53.4 of nurses expressed that the standard of pointers was haggle thirty-nine.7 moderate and to six.9 weak. Conclusion: though pointers quality was thought of acceptable by nearly half the nurses, up-to-dating the prevailing pointers and providing specific directions is felt for pointers implementation in every unit.

Keywords: Lymhocytic vasculitis Stevens-Johnson syndrome.

Citation:

Jessie EM. From the perspective of nurses, the quality of nursing evidence-based guidelines is excellent.. Journal of Nutrition and Food Science Research 2024.