Medication for axial spondylitis with Celebrex

Introduction

A type of chronic inflammatory arthritis that mostly affects the spine is called ankylosing spondylitis ^[1]. Ankylosing spondylitis is estimated to affect between 0·1% and 1·4% of people ^[1]. It is a disease that primarily affects young people, with a median presentation age of 26 years old ^[2]. Men are more likely than women to get it, with one study finding a 2.4:1 male to female ratio ^[3].The goals of treatment are to lessen symptoms, preserve posture and flexibility, and postpone structural damage ^{[4, 5]}. Although there is no known cure, physical therapy and exercise along with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs), such as COX-2 selective inhibitors, are advised as first-line treatment according to European and North American treatment guidelines ^{[4, 5]}.

This article describes the crucial role that inflammation plays in ankylosing spondylitis and summarises the information that is currently known regarding the safety and effectiveness of celecoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor that is one of the NSAID therapies for the condition that has received the greatest research. Lastly, celecoxib’s possible ability to change disease is explored. Inflammation Is A Key Component Of Ankylosing Spondylitis Sacroiliac joint, vertebral facet joint, and intervertebral disc fusion can result in ankylosing spondylitisis, which is characterised by inflammatory back pain that impairs movement and causes spinal stiffness ^[1]. Controlling inflammation early in the disease process may prevent ongoing structural damage, as chronic inflammation is likely a direct cause of stiffness and bone fusion ^[6].

Celecoxib Is An Effective Treatment Option For Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Guidelines Guidelines from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ^[5] state that the course of treatment should be determined by the disease’s current manifestations, including the severity and status of symptoms. Patient education and consistent exercise should serve as the foundation for non-pharmacological treatment, while disease monitoring (on an individual basis) should involve the patient’s history, clinical parameters, laboratory tests, and imaging ^[5].As first-line medication therapy, continued NSAID use—including COX-2 selective inhibitors—is advised. If NSAIDs prove ineffective, alternative pharmacological interventions, such as analgesics, directed corticosteroid injections, and anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF] therapy, should be explored ^[5]. In patients who are more severe and do not respond, surgery may also be considered ^[5].

Similar recommendations are made by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines ^[4], which also strongly support continued NSAID and physical therapy treatment. The American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines strongly advise against the use of systemic glucocorticoids and highly encourage anti-TNF medication for those who do not respond to NSAIDs or surgery for more severely affected patients ^[4]. Clinical data Celecoxib has been the subject of five randomised, controlled trials (Table 1) [7–11] for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. The trials showed non-inferiority when compared to non-selective NSAIDs and significantly better outcomes when compared with placebo. There were no recorded deaths while a patient was receiving active treatment; however, in one trial, a patient passed away after stopping celecoxib for ineffectiveness, but this was deemed unrelated to the medication ^[8].

Celecoxib was associated with severe decreased blood pressure, severe renal calculus, angina pectoris, dyspnea, sudden hearing loss, deterioration of ankylosing spondylitis, and familial Mediterranean fever, among other reported serious adverse events; however, the overall incidence was similar to controls [7–11]. In line with the demonstrated higher gastrointestinal safety of COX-2 selective inhibitors ^[12], celecoxib was generally well tolerated in these trials and was generally linked to numerically fewer gastrointestinal adverse events than the non-selective NSAID comparators [7–11]. Despite the trials’ short duration and relatively young patient population, there was no discernible variation in cardiovascular adverse events (Table 1) ^[13]. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis would almost certainly have a lower risk of gastrointestinal and cardiovascular complications because they are typically younger and have fewer comorbidities than most other patients treated with celecoxib ^[13].

However, as compared to non-selective NSAIDs like ibuprofen and naproxen, celecoxib is not linked to an elevated cardiovascular risk, according to data currently available from individuals with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis ^{[14, 15]}. A 52-week randomised, controlled trial has also investigated etoricoxib, an alternative COX-2 selective inhibitor ^[16]. In this trial, etoricoxib at 90 or 120 mg once daily was compared with placebo and naproxen at 500 mg twice daily for a total of 46 weeks, with a 6-week placebo-controlled period ^[16]. Over the course of the one-year active-comparator phase, the mean change in pain score at six weeks was -12.6 with a placebo, compared with -33.7 with naproxen and -41.5 and -41.6 with etoricoxib 90 mg and 120 mg, respectively ^[16].

Health authorities first suggested a daily dose of 90 mg of etoricoxib; however, recent regulatory actions have caused some nations to lower their initial recommendation of etoricoxib for ankylosing spondylitis ^[17]. It is now advised to begin at a dose of 60 mg per day, while some people may benefit from a higher dose of 90 mg per day. After patients have reached a state of clinical stability, the labelling suggests that they may resume taking 60 mg per day ^[18]. Disease Modification In Ankylosing Spondylitis Ankylosing spondylitis has no known cure, and standard disease-modifying anti-rheumatic medications (like methotrexate and sulfasalazine) have not been demonstrated to be efficacious in treating the condition ^[1,5].

At first, it was thought that NSAIDs would only be able to alter the symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis, having no impact on the disease’s course. On the other hand, compared to patients receiving treatment on demand, patients from one celecoxib randomised controlled trial ^[7] had a lower rate of radiological progression during their 2-year period of continuous treatment ^[19]. This decrease revealed that NSAIDs might be able to change the course of a disease in addition to relieving symptoms. Patients with a high NSAID intake over a two-year period demonstrated a similar reduction in radiographic progression ^[20], with the impact being especially noticeable in patients with increased C reactive protein (CRP).

It has been demonstrated that NSAID therapy lowers CRP levels, which are linked to more severe illness ^[21]. Additional acute phase reactants have also been linked to this process, with patients with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), high Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS)-CRP, or high ASDAS-ESR experiencing a more marked slowing of radiographic progression when on continuous NSAID treatment ^[22]. It is noteworthy that 2-year continuous diclofenac treatment ^[23] did not affect radiographic progression when compared with controls in studies similar to the ones previously described. This suggests that the effects of disease-modifying agents may be restricted to COX-2 selective inhibitors or to celecoxib alone. The Wnt signalling pathway, which interacts with the prostaglandin signalling pathway and plays a significant regulatory role in the processes of fracture repair and cartilage cell regeneration, may be linked to the inhibition of new bone formation caused by NSAIDs ^[24].

The prostaglandin E receptor 4 gene (PTGER4) was linked to both the severity and susceptibility to ankylosing spondylitis, according to a recent genome-wide association study ^[25]. NSAIDs, specifically COX-2 selective inhibitors, may have an impact on this process.Ankylosing spondylitis patients with syndesmophytes and baseline elevated inflammatory levels are at risk for radiographic progression; these patients have been demonstrated to benefit more from continuous NSAID use ^{[20, 22]}. This indicates that NSAIDs are most beneficial in patients at risk for delayed radiographic progression and new bone formation. Conclusions With a good amount of data supporting both its safety and effectiveness, celecoxib is one of the NSAIDs that patients with ankylosing spondylitis have received the most research.

It might also have the ability to modify disease, according to recent research. Even after experiencing the notable improvements in clinical symptoms that are frequently noted in clinical trials of this class of medications, patients with a high risk of radiographic progression may benefit from continuing to take celecoxib. Declarations Pfizer provided sponsorship for this publication. Chris Walker and Cindi Sounthonevat work for Pfizer, and Chris Walker has stock options with the company. Jian Zhu says she has no competing interests.Joshua Fink, PhD, of Engage Scientific Solutions, supplied medical writing assistance, which was paid for by Pfizer.

References

1. Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet. 2007;369:1379-1390.
2. Feldtkeller E, Khan MA, van der Heijde D, van der Linden S, Braun J. Age at disease onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2003;23(2):61-66.
3. Will R, Edmunds L, Elswood J, Calin A. Is there sexual inequality in ankylosing spondylitis? A study of 498 women and 1202 men. J Rheumatol. 1990;17(12):1649-1652.
4. Ward MM, Deodhar A, Akl EA, Lui A, Ermann J, Gensler LS, et al. American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network 2015 Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(2):282- 298. doi: 10.1002/art.39298
5. Braun J, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X, Boehm H, Burgos-Vargas R, Collantes-Estevez E, et al. 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(6):896- 904.
6. Schett G, Rudwaleit M. Can we stop progression of ankylosing spondylitis? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(3):363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.01.005
7. Barkhuizen A, Steinfeld S, Robbins J, West C, Coombs J, Zwillich S. Celecoxib is efficacious and well tolerated in treating signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(9):1805-1812.
8. Dougados M, Behier JM, Jolchine I, Calin A, van der Heijde D, Olivieri I, et al. Efficacy of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a six-week controlled study with comparison against placebo and against a conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(1):180- 185.
9. Huang F, Gu J, Liu Y, Zhu P, Zheng Y, Fu J, et al. Efficacy and safety of celecoxib in chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a 6-week randomized, double-blinded study with 6-week open-label extension treatment. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2014;76:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2014.08.002
10. Sieper J, Klopsch T, Richter M, Kapelle A, Rudwaleit M, Schwank S, et al. Comparison of two different dosages of celecoxib with diclofenac for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 12-week randomised, double-blind, controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(3):323-329.
11. Walker C, Essex MN, Li C, Park PW. Celecoxib versus diclofenac for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: 12- week randomized study in Norwegian patients. J Int Med Res. 2016;44(3):483-495.
12. Moore RA, Derry S, Phillips CJ, McQuay HJ. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cyxlooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs) and gastrointestinal harm: review of clinical trials and clinical practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:79.
13. Poddubnyy DA, Song IH, Sieper J. The safety of celecoxib in ankylosing spondylitis treatment. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008;7(4):401-409. doi: 10.1517/14740338.7.4.401
14. Bhala N, Emberson J, Merhi A, Abramson S, Arber N, Baron JA, et al. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2013;382(9894):769-779.doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(13)60900-9.
15. Nissen SE, Yeomans ND, Solomon DH, Lüscher TF, Libby P, Husni ME, et al. Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(26):2516-2529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611593 16. van der Heijde D, Baraf HS, Ramos-Remus C, Calin A, Weaver AL, Schiff M, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of etoricoxib in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a fifty-twoweek, randomized, controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(4):1205-1215.
16. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Drug Safety Update. 2016;10(3). Accessed 12 December, 2016.
17. Etoricoxib Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/spcpil/documents/spcpil/con1478239858936.pdf Accessed 12 December, 2016.
18. Wanders A, Heijde D, Landewe R, Behier JM, Calin A, Olivieri I, et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs reduce radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(6):1756-1765.
19. Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, Listing J, Marker-Hermann E, Zeidler H, et al. Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on radiographic spinal progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(10):1616-1622.
20. Benhamou M, Gossec L, Dougados M. Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein in ankylosing spondylitis and evaluation of the NSAIDs/coxibs’ treatment effect on C-reactive protein. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(3):536-541.
21. Kroon F, Landewe R, Dougados M, van der Heijde D. Continuous NSAID use reverts the effects of inflammation on radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(10):1623-1629. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201370
22. Sieper J, Listing J, Poddubnyy D, Song IH, Hermann KG, Callhoff J, et al. Effect of continuous versus on-demand treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with diclofenac over 2 years on radiographic progression of the spine: results from a randomised multicentre trial (ENRADAS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1438-1443.
23. Wendling D, Claudepierre P. New bone formation in axial spondyloarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2013;80(5):454-458.
24. Chai W, Lian Z, Chen C, Liu J, Shi LL, Wang Y. JARID1A, JMY, and PTGER4 polymorphisms are related to ankylosing spondylitis in Chinese Han patients: a case-control study. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74794. doi: 10.1371/journal pone.0074794

This is a text version generated from the article. For the formatted version of record (with original tables & figures), download the PDF →