Popular Keywords



Anti-inflammatory drugs


Chronic pains


Which of them Role Is It to Handle Abuse in the Medicine field? : A Case Report

Correspondence to Author: Rindsey Y, 

Tickson, Yarmouk University, Jordan University of Jordan, Jordan.

Abstract:   Harassing has huge, expansive ramifications for all wellbeing experts, understudies, students, patients, their families, and associations. Ha rassing is contradictory to sound authoritative culture, patient security, and impressive skill. A culture of security and regard in destinations of medical services schooling and work is basic to the prosperity of every body in medical services. This discourse on a case prescribes individual and aggregate reactions to harassing that express central clinical and moral qualities and being an expert.

CASE: Dr S is a second-year medical procedure occupant who is worried about a latest possible moment task to help Dr T in an aortic valve trade for the patient, JJ. Dr T frequently deigned to numerous understudies, learners, and partners and over and over unveiled, putting down comments about Dr S’s presentation, explicitly. During JJ’s a medical procedure, Dr T requested Dr S to get a 28 mm St Jude mechanical valve. Dr S stopped, be that as it may, reviewing from JJ’s patient record an earlier episode of gastrointestinal dying. Dr S puzzled over whether Dr T realized about this detail in JJ’s set of experiences, which would impact assessment of imminent dangers and advantages of long haul anticoagulation treatment that normally follows mechanical valve arrangement. Dr S felt scared by Dr T and faltered, needing to find out if a bioprosthetic valve, which wouldn’t require anticoagulation treatment, may be more proper for use for JJ’s situation. Dr T yelled, “What are you hanging tight for, S? Get the valve or get out!” Individuals from the careful group turned away, including Dr A, an anesthesiologist who has frequently seen Dr T’s eruptions and their belongings. Dr S recovered the valve and was occupied all through the remainder of the medical procedure. Hours after the fact, Dr S reminded herself to ensure there was an arrangement for assessing the patient’s requirement for long haul anticoagulation.

Discourse  Impressive skill is the lead, values, and characteristics that portray individuals from a calling and guide dynamic in morally testing, quickly changing clinical practice conditions. Wellbeing experts have obligations to keep up with ability and expertise guidelines in their fields, practice self-and gathering guideline, and express persevering through obligation to dependable, protected, fair consideration for all patients. Clinicians additionally resolve to rehearse with sympathy, empathy, regard, collegial commitment, and cooperation. Advanced groups exhibit characterizing qualities of amazing skill: sharing center moral qualities, displaying regard for individual experts, and advancing societies in which everybody has a good sense of security getting clarification on some pressing issues. While well-working proficient groups are cooperated with wellbeing frameworks with shared objectives and values — and when pioneers are focused on building frameworks that make it simple for colleagues to make the best decision — a culture of security is conceivable.

Wellbeing Society Sabotaged  The American Clinical Affiliation (AMA) characterizes working environment harassing as “rehashed, sincerely or genuinely oppressive, insolent, troublesome, unseemly, annoying, scaring, as well as compromising way of behaving designated at a particular individual or a gathering of people that appears from a genuine or saw power unevenness and is frequently, yet not consistently, expected to control, humiliate, subvert, undermine, or in any case hurt the objective.” Harassing can influence anybody paying little mind to gender,5 word related status, or nationality7 and is all the more habitually revealed by ladies and individuals from a few racial and ethnic gatherings. Ill bred conduct, including harassing and hostility, coordinated toward partners and students lessens their carefulness and ability to share concerns or request help and undermines group execution. Ill bred conduct adds to blunders, patient disappointment, and preventable antagonistic results. Patients who get care from specialists like Dr T are bound to encounter entanglements (eg, careful site contaminations, heart failure, septic shock, and stroke). Colleagues exposed to conduct like Dr T’s report decreased proficient fulfillment, disengagement, burnout, trouble, gloom, uneasiness, and self-destructive ideation. Those consistently presented or likely to examples of lack of respect can encounter torment, fibromyalgia, and cardiovascular infection. Harassing adds to expanded non-attendance and can sabotage associations’ endeavors to fabricate conscious, safe working environments. Reputational harm, legitimate expenses, and turnover are other hierarchical results of harassing and impolite way of behaving. At the point when single occurrences go ignored over the long haul, they produce broken practice designs. As a carefully prepared eyewitness of Dr T’s harmful way of behaving, Dr A, for instance, likewise consistently lets partners somewhere near leftover quiet, further disintegrating trust, subverting compelling correspondence, and compromising patient security.

 Everybody Is Mindful At the point when colleagues model fortitude by shouting out at the time and detailing occurrences when required, they build up alluring, wellbeing focused clinical and moral qualities (eg, regard, value, consideration) and assist with fortifying authoritative societies of security. As medical services practice proceeds to advance and mind conveyance patterns change, tending to irreverence and harassing will require joint effort among clinicians, proficient social orders, wellbeing callings schools and their entrance advisory boards, and medical care hierarchical pioneers. Forestalling harassing starts with perceiving the need to advance self-reflection and self-guideline valuable open doors during proficient turn of events, before examples of useless, amateurish way of behaving arise. To assist associations with accomplishing a work environment wellbeing society, the AMA laid out rules, among which coming up next are key4: • Portray hierarchical pioneers’ “obligation to giving a protected and sound working environment.” • “Frame ventures for people to take when they believe they are a casualty of working environment harassing.” • “Give contact data to a secret method for recording and revealing episodes.” • Lay out “strategies and direct intercessions inside the setting of the hierarchical obligation to the wellbeing and prosperity of all staff.” Laying out and keeping a framework wide companion detailing and input component further develops responsibility and improves proficient self-administrative limit and can assist with persuading self-reflection.33 For instance, experts ought to think about the accompanying inquiries: • Do I figure out connections among slight and unfriendly results for my patients? • How would it be advisable for me to make it more straightforward for others to team up with me to really focus well on our patients? • Do I comprehend how to answer somebody communicating slight toward a partner, patient, or myself? • How might I cooperate with hierarchical pioneers to help my partners really and economically? Associations have obligations to patients and staff to advance wellbeing, to elevate consciousness of dangers to somewhere safe that harassing and different types of lack of respect make, to lay out clear cycles by which episodes that compromise security can be securely revealed (eg, by limiting weakness to or apprehension about response), and to survey and answer occurrences and examples of amateurish way of behaving fairly and really. We would say, reactions to reports of episodes are not all around facilitated or reliably or impartially applied to all colleagues, particularly when misuse is committed by people like Dr T who, regardless of being seen as “high worth” as far as having developed a selective range of abilities or ability to produce income, sanction ways of behaving destructive to collegiality or the standing of the hierarchical work environment. The quest for an advanced proficient group starts with unfaltering affirmation of shared clinical and moral qualities communicated through proficient coordinated effort with dynamic hierarchical pioneers with the boldness and position to offer steady support of values and reliable informing and requirement (eg, in execution surveys) of ways of behaving and rehearses that are boosted (or punished). To advance a culture of security and impressive skill, pioneers ought to consider everybody similarly responsible, perceive experts who surpass assumptions, utilize and successfully use detailing frameworks, and give adequate assets to people and groups to fabricate and keep up with these efforts.41 It is through this obligation to a superior culture zeroed in on wellbeing that all medical services laborers and learners, hierarchical pioneers, managers, patients, and families can tolerate upping for medication and be watchful supporters for the clinical calling.

 REFERENCES 1. Egener BE, Mason DJ, McDonald WJ, et al. The Charter on Professionalism for Health Care Organizations. Acad Med. 2017;92(8):1091-1099.
2. Hickson GB, Moore IN, Pichert JW, Benegas M Jr. Balancing systems and individual accountability in a safety culture. In: Berman S, ed. From Front Office to Front Line: Essential Issues for Health Care Leaders. 2nd ed. Joint Commission Resources; Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2012:1-36.
3. Edmondson AC. Wicked-problem solvers. Harvard Business Review. June 2016. Accessed June 24, 2021. https://hbr.org/2016/06/wicked-problem-solvers.
4. American Medical Association. Bullying in the practice of medicine H-515.951. Accessed October 9, 2021. https://policysearch.ama- assn.org/policyfinder/detail/ AMA%20Policy%20H- 515.951?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD. xml-H-515.951.xml
5. O’Donnell SM, MacIntosh JA. Gender and workplace bullying: men’s experiences of surviving bullying at work. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(3):351-366.
6. Ortega A, Høgh A, Pejtersen JH, Feveile H, Olsen O. Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: a representative population study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(3):417-426.
7. Salin D. Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: a comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2001;10(4):425-441.
8. Rouse LP, Gallagher-Garza S, Gebhard RE, Harrison SL, Wallace LS. Workplace bullying among family physicians: a gender focused study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(9):882-888.
9. Lewis D, Gunn R. Workplace bullying in the public sector: understanding the racial dimension. Public Adm. 2007;85(3):641-665.
10. Fox S, Stallworth LE. Racial/ethnic bullying: exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. J Vocat Behav. 2005;66(3):438-456.
11. Riskin A, Erez A, Foulk TA, et al. The impact of rudeness on medical team performance: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2015;136(3):487-495.
12. Katz D, Blasius K, Isaak R, et al. Exposure to incivility hinders clinical performance in a simulated operative crisis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(9):750- 757.
13. Sentinel event alert 40: behaviors that undermine a culture of safety. Joint Commission. July 9, 2008. Updated June 2021. Accessed October 9, 2021. https://www. jointcommission.org/resources/patient-safety-topics/ sentinel- event/sentinel-event-alert-newsletters/sentinel event-alert-issue-40-behaviors- that-undermine-a culture-of-safety/
14. Longo J, Hain D. Bullying: a hidden threat to patient safety. Nephrol Nurs J. 2014;41(2):193-200.
15. Houck NM, Colbert AM. Patient safety and workplace bullying: an integrative review. J Nurs Care Qual. 2017;32(2):164-171.
16. Cooper WO, Spain DA, Guillamondegui O, et al. Association of coworker reports about unprofessional behavior by surgeons with surgical complications in their patients. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(9):828-834.
17. Cooper WO, Guillamondegui O, Hines OJ, et al. Use of unsolicited patient observations to identify surgeons with increased risk for postoperative complications. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(6):522-529.
18. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Workplace bullying: a tale of adverse consequences. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2015;12(1- 2):32-37.
19. Lever I, Dyball D, Greenberg N, Stevelink SAM. Health consequences of bullying in the healthcare workplace: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(12):3195-3209.
20. Ariza-Montes A, Muniz NM, Montero-Simó MJ, Araque Padilla RA. Workplace bullying among healthcare workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(8):3121-3139.
21. Nielsen MB, Nielsen GH, Notelaers G, Einarsen S. Workplace bullying and suicidal ideation: a 3-wave longitudinal Norwegian study. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(11):e23-e28.
22. Leach LS, Poyser C, Butterworth P. Workplace bullying and the association with suicidal ideation/thoughts and behaviour: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(1):72-79.
23. Kääria S, Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E, Leino Arjas P. Risk factors of chronic neck pain: a prospective study among middle-aged employees. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(6):911-920.
24. Saastamoinen P, Laaksonen M, Leino-Arjas P, Lahelma E. Psychosocial risk factors of pain among employees. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(1):102-108.
25. Kivimäki M, Leino-Arjas P, Virtanen M, et al. Work stress and incidence of newly diagnosed fibromyalgia: prospective cohort study. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57(5):417-422.
26. Ayyala MS, Chaudhry S, Windish D, Dupras D, Reddy ST, Wright SM. Awareness of bullying in residency: results of a national survey of internal medicine program directors. J Grad Med Educ. 2018;10(2):209-213.
27. Kivimäki M, Virtanen M, Vartia M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J, Keltikangas-Jarvinen L. Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(10):779-783.
28. Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J. Workplace bullying and sickness absence in hospital staff. Occup Environ Med. 2000;57(10):656-660.
29. Quick safety 24: bullying has no place in health care. Joint Commission. Updated June 2021. Accessed October 9, 2021. https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/news and- multimedia/newsletters/newsletters/quick-safety/ quick-safety-issue-24- bullying-has-no-place-in-health care/bullying-has-no-place-in-health-care/
30. Fowler J. Financial impacts of workplace bullying. Investopedia. July 16, 2012. Accessed December 18, 2019. https://www.investopedia.com/financial- edge/0712/ financial-impacts-of-workplace-bullying.aspx
31. Hogh A, Hoel H, Carneiro IG. Bullying and employee turnover among healthcare workers: a three-wave prospective study. J Nurs Manag. 2011;19(6):742-751.
32. Hickson GB, Federspiel CF, Pichert JW, Miller CS, Gauld Jaeger J, Bost P. Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA. 2002;287(22):2951-2957.
33. Webb LE, Dmochowski RR, Moore IN, et al. Using coworker observations to promote accountability for disrespectful and unsafe behaviors by physicians and advanced practice professionals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016;42(4):149- 161.
34. Ayyala MS, Rios R, Wright SM. Perceived bullying among internal medicine residents. JAMA. 2019;322(6):576-578.
35. Wallace SC, Gipson K. Bullying in healthcare: a disruptive force linked to compromised patient safety. Pa Patient Saf Advis. 2017;14(2):64-70.
36. Sprigg CA, Niven K, Dawson J, Farley S, Armitage CJ. Witnessing workplace bullying and employee well being: a two-wave field study. J Occup Health Psychol.2019;24(2):286-296.
37. Beta Heart®. Beta Healthcare Group. Accessed June 29, 2021. https://betahg.com/risk-management-and-safety/ beta-heart/
38. Beta Heart—care for the caregiver. Beta Healthcare Group. Accessed June 29, 2021. https://betahg.com/beta heart-care-for-the-caregiver/
39. Pichert JW, Moore IN, Karrass J, et al. An intervention model that promotes accountability: peer messengers and patient/family complaints. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(10):435-446.
40. Hickson GB, Pichert JW, Webb LE, Gabbe SG. A complementary approach to promoting professionalism: identifying, measuring, and addressing unprofessional behaviors. Acad Med. 2007;82(11):1040-1048.
41. Hickson GB, Cooper WO. Pursuing professionalism (but not without an infrastructure). In: Byyny RL, Byyny R, Christensen S, Fish J, eds. Medical Professionalism Best Practices: Addressing Burnout in Our Profession. Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society; 2020:chap 7. Accessed October 9, 2021.

Rindsey Y.Tickson. Which of them Role Is It to Handle Abuse in the Medicine field?. Journal of Pain 2024.

Journal Info

  • Journal Name: Journal of Pain
  • Impact Factor: 2.0
  • ISSN: 2996-1793
  • DOI: 10.52338/jop
  • Short Name: JOP
  • Acceptance rate: 55%
  • Volume: 6 (2024)
  • Submission to acceptance: 25 days
  • Acceptance to publication: 10 days


  • Crossref indexed journal
  • Publons indexed journal
  • Pubmed-indexed journal
  • International Scientific Indexing (ISI)-indexed journal
  • Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI) index journal
  • Semantic Scholar indexed journal
  • Cosmos indexed journal


  • International Reach
  • Peer Review
  • Rapid Publication
  • Open Access
  • High Visibility