Popular Keywords

Adrenal Disorders

Breast Cancer and Ovarian Cancer

Endocrine Diseases

Gynecology and Obstetrics

Hormone

Leukoencephalopathy

Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 2026, Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages: 1-4

Evaluating The Safety And Effectiveness Of Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES) In Patients With Severe Gastroparesis During Pregnancy.

Correspondence to Author: Alan Askari 1 , HP Priyantha Siriwardana 2 , Ali Kordzadeh2 , Esturo Yazaki 2 , Sritharan Kadirkamanathan 2

1. Department of General Surgery, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lewsey Rod, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU4 0DZ.
2. Department of Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Broomfield Hospital, Essex, UK, CM1 7ET

DOI: 10.52338/jocogr.2026.5294

Abstract:

Introduction: Gastroparesis presents a significant challenge in pregnancy, affecting maternal and foetal health. This paper examines the safety and efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES) as a therapeutic modality in pregnant patients with gastroparesis.
Materials & Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on pregnant patients with in-situ GES identified from our gastroparesis patient database. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of GES during pregnancy, focusing on Quality of Life (QoL) improvements and symptom control. Key metrics included QoL SF36 scores, and the severity of nausea, vomiting, pain, satiety, and bloating. Hospital stay lengths, admission frequency, and the need for feeding support were also assessed both pre- and post-operatively
Results: The study included twelve pregnant women with in-situ GES. The median age at surgery was 29 years (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 26-31 years), with 58% of the patients having diabetes-induced gastroparesis. Robotic GES insertion was performed in 75% of cases. Postoperatively, significant improvements were observed in nausea score (reduced from 4 to 1), vomiting score (from 4 to 0), pain score (from 4 to 1), satiety score (from 4 to 0), and bloating score (from 4 to 0). SF36 scores improved significantly, increasing from a median pre-operative score of 261 (IQR: 178-65) to 1,783 (IQR: 765-3,527, p<0.001). Additionally, 58% of patients transitioned from assisted to independent feeding.
Conclusion: Gastric Electrical Stimulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality for gastroparesis in pregnant patients, significantly improving symptoms and QoL. Further extensive research is warranted to validate these findings and explore the broader implications of GES in the management of pregnancy-associated gastroparesis.

Keywords: pregnancy, gastroparesis, Gastric Electrical Stimulator (GES).

Citation:

Dr. HP Priyantha Siriwardana, Evaluating The Safety And Effectiveness Of Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES) In Patients With Severe Gastroparesis During Pregnancy. Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Research 2026.

Journal Info

  • Journal Name: Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Research
  • ISSN: 2766-2756
  • DOI: 10.52338/Jocogr
  • Short Name: Jocogr
  • Acceptance rate: 55%
  • Volume: (2025)
  • Submission to acceptance: 25 days
  • Acceptance to publication: 10 days
  • Crossref indexed journal
  • Publons indexed journal
  • Pubmed-indexed journal
  • International Scientific Indexing (ISI)-indexed journal
  • Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI) index journal
  • Semantic Scholar indexed journal
  • Cosmos indexed journal

OUR PUBLICATION BENEFITS

  • International Reach
  • Peer Review
  • Rapid Publication
  • Open Access
  • High Visibility