ISSN-registered · Peer-reviewed · Open Access
JournalsAboutContact
Scientific Writing

Writing Clear Scientific English (A Guide for Non-Native Authors)

DE By Directive Editorial Team, Directive Publications ·5 Aug 2026 ·7 min read
Writing Clear Scientific English (A Guide for Non-Native Authors)

English is the working language of most science, and most of the people writing it did not grow up speaking it. That is not a disadvantage to hide — it is simply a reason to write plainly. Clear scientific English is not "beautiful" English; it is English that gets out of the way so the reader sees your work. The techniques below help any author, but they matter most when English is your second, third or fourth language.

Short sentences carry more

The single most effective change most authors can make is to write shorter sentences. A sentence that runs for four lines and carries three ideas will lose the reader — and reviewers read tired. Aim for one main idea per sentence. If you find yourself using "which", "whereby" or a third comma, consider a full stop instead.

Prefer the active voice

Scientific writing has a habit of the passive voice — "it was observed that" — which adds words and hides who did what. The active voice is usually shorter and clearer:

Instead ofWrite
It was observed that levels increased.Levels increased.
The samples were analysed by the authors.We analysed the samples.
An improvement was seen in the group.The group improved.

Methods sections sometimes use the passive by convention, and that is fine — but do not reach for it everywhere out of habit.

Cut the filler

Certain phrases add length without meaning. Delete them or replace them:

  • "It is important to note that" → (just say the thing)
  • "In order to" → "to"
  • "Due to the fact that" → "because"
  • "A number of" → "several" or the actual number
  • "In the present study, we aimed to investigate" → "We investigated"

Two pitfalls that flag non-native writing

Reviewers are forgiving of accent in prose, but two errors recur and are worth checking specifically:

  • Articles (a / an / the). Many languages have no articles, so they are easy to drop or overuse. When you revise, read each noun and ask: is this a specific thing (the) or one of many (a)?
  • Tense consistency. Describe what you did in the past tense ("we measured"), and established facts in the present ("water boils at 100 °C"). Switching mid-paragraph is jarring.

One idea per paragraph

A paragraph should make one point and support it. If a paragraph changes topic halfway, split it. Start each paragraph with the sentence that states its point — a reader skimming your headings and first sentences should still follow the argument.

Test: read only the first sentence of every paragraph. If that alone tells a coherent story, your structure is sound.

Get a fluent read before you submit

You cannot fully proofread your own writing — you read what you meant, not what you wrote. Before submission, have a fluent English speaker (ideally in your field) read it, or use a professional language-editing service. Reading your paper aloud also catches sentences that do not breathe. Fix the argument first, then the sentences, then the words — in that order.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can poor English get a good paper rejected?
It can. If reviewers cannot follow the argument, they may recommend rejection even when the science is sound. Language rarely sinks a strong paper on its own, but it lowers the reviewer's confidence and makes every other weakness feel larger.
Should I pay for language editing?
If you can, a professional language edit or a fluent colleague's read is worth it — but fix the structure first. Editing cannot rescue an unclear argument; it can only polish a clear one.
Is it acceptable to use AI to improve my English?
Using a tool to improve grammar and phrasing is generally acceptable, but you remain responsible for the accuracy of every sentence, and many journals ask you to disclose substantial AI assistance. Never let a tool change your meaning.
DE
Directive Editorial Team
Directive Publications

The editorial team at Directive Publications — an international open-access publisher of peer-reviewed medical and scientific journals.

Publishing your research?

Directive Publications is an open-access publisher — every article peer-reviewed, Crossref-registered, and free to read under CC BY 4.0.

Submit a manuscript →Read our Scientific Writing policy →