Correlation Between Biochemical And Histological Markers In Experimental Nephrotoxicity: Insights From Anacardium Occidentale Leaf Extract Intervention

Background

: Concordance between biomedical and histological markers is critical for robust interpretation of preclinical nephroprotection studies. Objective: To analyse the relationship between commonly used serum renal biomarkers and histopathological damage in albino rat model of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced nephrotoxicity, exploring the effects of different Anacardium occidentale (cashew) leaf extracts. Methods: thirty adult albino rats were randomized to six groups (n = 5): control, CCl4 -only, CCl4 with N-acetylcysteine (NAC; 100 mg/kg) and CCl4 with aqueous, ethanol, or n-hexane cashew leaf extracts (200 mg/kg each). Serum Urea and creatinine were measured using enzymatic methods alongside detailed histological scoring (0 – 12 scale). Pearson correlation analysis were performed across groups. Results: CCl4 administration significantly elevated serum urea (45.8 ± 4.3 vs.

18.4 ± 1.4 mg/dl; p ˂ 0.001) and creatinine (2.18 ± 0.32 vs. 0.54 ± 0.09 mg/dl; p ˂ 0.001) compared to controls. Both markers exhibited strong positive correlations with composite histological damage scores (urea: r = 0.94, R2 = 0.88; creatinine: r = 0.96, R2 = 0.92; p ˂ 0.001). the ethanol extract group achieved near-normalization of serum markers (urea: 24.1 ± 2.2 mg/dl; creatinine: 0.72 ± 0.11 mg/dl) and histological scores (2.4 ± 0.2), comparable to NAC treatment. The n-hexane showed minimal protection with persistently elevated markers. Conclusion: Biochemical and histological endpoints are tightly correlated in CCl4 -induced nephrotoxicity. The ethanol extract of A. occidentale leaves demonstrates robust nephroprotection, supporting its therapeutic potential for renal health.

Keywords: Nephrotoxicity; Anacardium occidentale; Carbon tetrachloride; Renal biomarkers; Histopathology, Phytomedicine.

Introduction

Nephrotoxicity remains a significant clinical and public health concern, with acute and chronic kidney injuries contributing to high morbidity and mortality worldwide (Kiliś-Pstrusińska & Wiela-Hojeńska, 2021). Nephrotoxicity remains a significant clinical and public health concern, with acute and chronic kidney injuries contributing to high morbidity and mortality worldwide (Kiliś-Pstrusińska & Wiela- Hojeńska, 2021). The assessment of nephroprotective agents in preclinical models typically relies on two main endpoints: changes in serum biochemical markers (e.g., urea, creatinine) and histopathological evaluation of renal tissue (Burtis et al., 2011). While serum markers are convenient and noninvasive, they may not fully reflect the extent and nature of tissue injury. Conversely, histopathology provides direct evidence of cellular damage but requires invasive sampling and specialized expertise (Bancroft & Gamble, 2008).

Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4 ) is a well-established hepato-nephrotoxin that induces oxidative stress through cytochrome P450- mediated bioactivation, generating trichloromethyl radicals (CCl3 -) that initiate lipid peroxidation and cellular damage in renal tissues (Yoshioka et al., 2016; Mazani et al., 2020). This model provides a reproducible platform for evaluating nephroprotective interventions. Integrated analysis of both biochemical and histological markers is essential for robust interpretation of nephroprotection studies and for the translation of preclinical findings to clinical applications. However, relatively few studies have systematically analysed the degree of concordance between these endpoints in the context of nephrotoxin-induced injury and phytomedicine intervention (Laasya et al., 2020). Anacardium occidentale (cashew) leaves are extensively used in traditional medicine for the management of renal and metabolic ailments (Salehi et al., 2019).

Recent pharmacological studies have demonstrated their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and nephroprotective properties, particularly in models of chemically induced renal injury (Aminu et al., 2023; Baptista et al., 2020). The nephroprotective efficacy appears to be extracttype dependent, likely reflecting differences in phytochemical composition including phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins (Amira et al., 2020; Dada & Agesin, 2022). The present study aims to (1) comparatively assess the nephroprotective effects of aqueous, ethanol, and n-hexane extracts of A. occidentale leaves in a rat model of CCl4 -induced nephrotoxicity; and (2) analyze the correlation between serum biochemical markers and histopathological damage scores across treatment groups. This integrated approach provides insight into the reliability of serum markers as surrogates for tissue protection and informs the development of phytomedicines for renal health.

Materials and Methods

All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and comply with the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines 2.0. Study Design This was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group experimental study. Sample size was determined based on previous nephrotoxicity studies using CCl4 models. With an expected effect size of 1.5 (Cohen's d) for serum creatinine changes between control and CCl4 groups, α = 0.05, and power = 0.80, a minimum of n=5 per group was required (G*Power 3.1). This sample size is consistent with OECD guidelines for acute toxicity testing. Animals and Housing Thirty adult male albino Wistar rats (180–220 g) were obtained from the Animal House of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Animals were acclimatized for two weeks under standard laboratory conditions (22±2°C, 12-hour light/dark cycle, 50-60% relative humidity) with free access to standard rodent chow (Vital Feeds, Nigeria) and clean drinking water ad libitum. Chemicals and Reagents Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4 , ≥99.5% purity, CAS: 56-23-5) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Olive oil (pharmaceutical grade) was used as CCl4 vehicle. Commercial assay kits for serum urea (urease- GLDH method) and creatinine (Jaffe kinetic method) were purchased from Randox Laboratories Ltd. (Crumlin, UK). All other reagents were of analytical grade. Plant Material and Authentication Fresh, mature leaves of Anacardium occidentale L. were harvested in June 2025 from Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.

The plant was authenticated by a taxonomist at the Department of Plant Science and Biotechnology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka (Voucher specimen number: UNH/2025/No. 209-PSB- 824). Leaves were rinsed with distilled water, shade-dried for 14 days, pulverized using an electric blender, and stored in airtight amber containers until extraction. Preparation of Extracts Three extract types were prepared from 100 g of powdered leaf material each: Aqueous Extract: Boiled in 1 L distilled water for 30 minutes, filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 40°C. Yield: 12.4 g (12.4% w/w). Ethanol Extract (70%): Macerated in 1 L of 70% ethanol for 48 hours with intermittent shaking, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure at 40°C.

Yield: 8.7 g (8.7% w/w). N-Hexane Extract: Extracted using Soxhlet apparatus with 500 mL n-hexane for 6 hours, evaporated to dryness. Yield: 3.2 g (3.2% w/w). All extracts were stored at 4°C and reconstituted in distilled water immediately before administration. Experimental Groups Thirty albino rats were randomly assigned to six groups (n=5 per group) using computer-generated random numbers: Group 1 (Control): Distilled water + olive oil vehicle Group 2 (CCl4 Only): CCl4 (1 mL/kg, i.p., 1:1 in olive oil) Group 3 (CCl4 + NAC): CCl4 + N-acetylcysteine (100 mg/kg, p.o.) Group 4 (CCl4 + Aqueous): CCl4 + Aqueous extract (200 mg/ kg, p.o.) Group 5 (CCl4 + Ethanol): CCl4 + Ethanol extract (200 mg/kg, p.o.) Group 6 (CCl4 + n-Hexane): CCl4 + n-Hexane extract (200 mg/ kg, p.o.) CCl4 (1 ml/kg intraperitoneal (i.p), diluted 1:1 with olive oil) was administered on day 1.

Treatments were administered daily for 14 days. Sample Collection On day 15, following overnight fasting, animals were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (80/10 mg/kg, i.p). Blood was collected via cardiac puncture into plain tubes, allowed to clot for 30 minutes, and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes to obtain serum. Kidneys were immediately excised, weighed, and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological examination. Biochemical Analysis Serum urea was determined using the urease-glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) enzymatic method, while serum creatinine was measured using the Jaffe kinetic colorimetric method, following manufacturer's protocols (Randox Laboratories). Analyses were performed using a semiautomated clinical chemistry analyzer (Humalyzer 3000, Human Diagnostics, Germany). All samples were analyzed in duplicate and mean values reported.

Histopathological Analysis Fixed kidney tissues were processed through graded ethanol series, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections (5 μm thickness) were cut using a rotary microtome and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Histopathological assessment was performed by a boardcertified veterinary pathologist blinded to treatment group assignments. Slides were coded with random identifiers prior to scoring. A composite histological damage score (0-12) was calculated based on four parameters, each scored 0-3: Glomerular damage (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), Tubular necrosis (0 = none, 1 = <25%, 2 = 25-50%, 3 = >50%), Interstitial inflammation (0 = absent, 1 = focal, 2 = multifocal, 3 = diffuse), and Fibrosis (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate,3=severe).Asubsetofslides(20%)wasre-evaluated to assess intra-observer reliability (Cohen's kappa = 0.89).

Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Normality of data distribution was verified using the Shapiro- Wilk test prior to parametric analyses. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc test was used for multiple group comparisons. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d for pairwise comparisons. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was used to assess linear relationships between serum biochemical markers and histological damage scores, with coefficient of determination (R²) reported to indicate variance explained. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for correlation coefficients. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Effects on Serum Biochemical Markers Administration of CCl4 induced significant nephrotoxicity, as evidenced by marked elevation of serum urea (45.8 ± 4.3 mg/dL) and creatinine (2.18 ± 0.32 mg/dL) compared to control values (18.4 ± 1.4 mg/dL and 0.54 ± 0.09 mg/dL, respectively; p < 0.001). The effect sizes for these changes were large (Cohen's d = 8.54 for urea; d = 6.98 for creatinine). All treatment interventions significantly attenuated CCl4 - induced elevations in serum markers (p < 0.001 vs. CCl4 group). The ethanol extract demonstrated the strongest nephroprotective effect, reducing serum urea to 24.1 ± 2.2 mg/dL (47.4% reduction from CCl4 ) and creatinine to 0.72 ± 0.11 mg/dL (67.0% reduction), comparable to NAC treatment (urea: 21.4 ± 1.8 mg/dL; creatinine: 0.68 ± 0.12 mg/dL).

The aqueous extract showed moderate protection (urea: 28.5 ± 2.5 mg/dL; creatinine: 0.95 ± 0.14 mg/dL), while the n-hexane extract exhibited the least efficacy (urea: 32.8 ± 3.2 mg/dL; creatinine: 1.24 ± 0.18 mg/dL). Histopathological Findings Control group kidneys exhibited normal glomerular and tubular architecture with no evidence of inflammation or fibrosis (histological score: 0.0 ± 0.0). CCl4 administration induced severe renal damage characterized by glomerular congestion, extensive tubular necrosis, interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration, and early fibrotic changes (composite score: 10.0 ± 0.0). The ethanol extract group showed marked histological improvement with minimal glomerular changes, rare tubular necrosis, and negligible inflammation (score: 2.4 ± 0.2), comparable to NAC (score: 2.4 ± 0.2).

The aqueous extract provided moderate protection (score: 4.4 ± 0.3), while the n-hexane extract showed persistent histological damage (score: 6.8 ± 0.4). Table 1. Treatment Effects on Renal Parameters. Treatment_Effects Group Urea (mg/dL) Creatinine (mg/dL) Histological Score (0-12) Control 18.4 ± 1.4 0.54 ± 0.09 0.0 ± 0.0 CCl4 Only 45.8 ± 4.3* 2.18 ± 0.32* 10.0 ± 0.0* CCl4 + NAC 21.4 ± 1.8# 0.68 ± 0.12# 2.4 ± 0.2# CCl4 + Aqueous Extract 28.5 ± 2.5# 0.95 ± 0.14# 4.4 ± 0.3# CCl4 + Ethanol Extract 24.1 ± 2.2# 0.72 ± 0.11# 2.4 ± 0.2# CCl4 + N-Hexane Extract 32.8 ± 3.2# 1.24 ± 0.18# 6.8 ± 0.4# Values are mean ± SD (n=5).

*p < 0.001 vs. Control; #p < 0.001 vs. CCl4 Only (one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD). *Significantly different from control (p < 0.001); #Significantly different from CCl4 group (p < 0.001). Correlation Analysis Shapiro-Wilk tests confirmed normal distribution of all variables (p > 0.05), validating the use of Pearson correlation analysis. Both serum biochemical markers demonstrated strong positive correlations with composite histological damage scores across all experimental groups: • Serum Urea vs. Histological Score: r = 0.94, R² = 0.88, 95% CI [0.87-0.98], p < 0.001•SerumCreatininevs.HistologicalScore:r=0.96,R²=0.92, 95% CI [0.91-0.99], p < 0.001 These correlations indicate that 88% and 92% of the variance in histological damage scores can be explained by serum urea and creatinine levels, respectively.

Table 2. Correlation Analysis Marker Pair Pearson r/R2/95% p-value Creatinine vs. Histological Score 0.96/0.92/0.91-0.99 <0.001 Urea vs. Histological Score 0.94/0.88/0.87-0.98 <0.001 Extract-Specific Observations No discordance was observed between biochemical and histological outcomes across treatment groups. The ranking of nephroprotective efficacy was consistent across both assessment modalities: Ethanol extract NAC > Aqueous extract > n-Hexane extract > CCl4 only. This concordance supports the reliability of serum markers as surrogates for tissue-level protection in this model.

Discussion

This study demonstrates a high degree of concordance between serum biochemical markers (urea, creatinine) and histological indices of kidney injury in a CCl4 -induced nephrotoxicity model. The strong positive correlations (r = 0.94-0.96) and high coefficients of determination (R² = 0.88- 0.92) suggest that serum markers reliably reflect underlying tissue damage, validating their use as surrogate endpoints in preclinicalnephroprotectionresearch.ThemechanismofCCl4 - induced nephrotoxicity involves cytochrome P450-mediated bioactivation to trichloromethyl radicals (CCl3 -), which initiate lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress, and subsequent cellular damage in renal tubular epithelium (Yoshioka et al., 2016). The elevated serum urea and creatinine observed in the CCl4 group reflect impaired glomerular filtration and tubular dysfunction, consistent with the severe histopathological changes observed.

The superior nephroprotective effect of the ethanol extract is attributed to its higher phenolic and flavonoid content compared to aqueous and n-hexane extracts. Ethanol (70%) efficiently extracts polyphenolic compounds including quercetin, kaempferol, and anacardic acids, which possess potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties (Amira et al., 2020; Baptista et al., 2020). These phytochemicals may scavenge free radicals, inhibit lipid peroxidation, and modulate inflammatory pathways, thereby attenuating CCl4 - induced oxidative renal damage. The moderate protection afforded by the aqueous extract likely reflects the extraction of water-soluble polyphenols and glycosides, albeit at lower concentrations than the ethanol extract. The minimal efficacy of the n-hexane extract is consistent with its limited extraction of bioactive polyphenols, as n-hexane preferentially extracts lipophilic compounds such as fatty acids and terpenoids with lesser antioxidant capacity (Dada & Agesin, 2022).

Our findings align with previous reports demonstrating nephroprotective effects of A. occidentale extracts in chemically-induced renal injury models (Aminu et al., 2023). Importantly, the ethanol extract achieved nephroprotection comparable to N-acetylcysteine, a clinically established antioxidant used in acetaminophen toxicity and contrast-induced nephropathy, suggesting translational potential for standardized cashew leaf preparations. The integrated assessment approach employed in this study addresses a gap in nephrotoxicity research, where biochemical and histological endpoints are often reported separately without formal correlation analysis. Our results support the validity of serum markers as practical, non-invasive surrogates for tissue damage assessment, while acknowledging that histopathology remains the gold standard for mechanistic insights.

Limitations

Several limitations were acknowledged 1. Sample size (n=5 per group) may limit statistical power for detecting smaller effect sizes, though it is consistent with OECD guidelines and comparable studies. 2. The acute CCl4 model may not fully represent chronic nephrotoxicity or the complex pathophysiology of human kidney disease. 3. Only two biochemical markers (urea, creatinine) were assessed; additional markers such as cystatin C, NGAL, KIM-1, or oxidative stress parameters could provide mechanistic insights. 4. Histopathological scoring, while performed by a blinded pathologist, remains semi-quantitative; digital image analysis and morphometry are recommended for future studies. 5. Dose-response relationships were not explored; a single dose (200 mg/kg) was used for all extracts.

6. Sex-specific effects were not evaluated as only male rats were used. 7. Long-term outcomes and potential extract toxicity at higher doses were not assessed. 8. Phytochemical quantification of individual bioactive compounds was not performed. Future Directions 1. Evaluate biochemical-histological correlations in chronic nephrotoxicity and polypharmacy models. 2. Expand biomarker panels to include novel kidney injury markers and oxidative stress parameters. 3. Conduct dose-response studies to establish optimal therapeutic doses. 4. Perform detailed phytochemical profiling and bioactivityguided fractionation of active extracts. 5. Assess clinical translation potential through pharmacokinetic and safety studies. 6. Investigate sex-specific responses and include female animals in future studies.

Conclusions

This study confirms a robust, positive correlation between serum biochemical markers (urea, creatinine) and histological endpoints in CCl4 -induced nephrotoxicity treated with A. occidentale leaf extracts. The coefficients of determination (R² = 0.88-0.92) validate serum markers as reliable surrogates for tissue damage assessment in preclinical research. Among the three extract types evaluated, the 70% ethanol extract demonstrated the strongest nephroprotective effect, restoring both serum and tissue markers to nearnormal levels comparable to N-acetylcysteine. These results support the integrated use of biochemical and histological markers in nephrotoxicity assessment and encourage further investigation into standardized, polyphenol-rich cashew leaf preparations for renal health applications. Impact Statement This study validates serum biochemical markers (urea, creatinine) as reliable surrogates for histopathological kidney damageinpreclinicalnephrotoxicityresearch,withcoefficients of determination (R2) of 0.88-0.92.

our findings demonstrate that ethanol extracts of Anacardium occidental leaves offer nephroprotection comparable to the clinical antioxidant N-acetylcysteine, supporting the therapeutic potential of polyphenol-rich cashew leaf preparations. These results have direct implications for phytomedicine development, standardization of plant-based nephroprotective agents, and the design of preclinical toxicology studies requiring integrated biomarker assessment. Conflict Of Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Author Contributions Ojiako Nkiruka Peace: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Project administration.

Etu Esther Ifeyinwa: Resources. Onyemelukwe Anulika: Writing - Review & Editing. Ogu Cornelius: Formal analysis, Software, Visualization. Azubuike Nkiruka: Investigation, Resources. Achukwu Peter: Supervision, Histopathological analysis, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing. Data Availability The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Acknowledgments The authors thank the staff of the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, for their technical support during this study. We also acknowledge the Department of Plant Science and Biotechnology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, for plant authentication services.

References

1. Aminu, A., Umar, H. O., Makena, W., Isa, Z. A., Goni, Z. M., Onimisi, O. B., & Ishaku, B. (2023).
2. Antagonistic effectiveness of Anacardium occidentale leaf extract on lead-acetate exposure-induced hepatorenal toxicity in rats. Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology, 38(4), e2023028. https://doi org/10.5620/eaht.2023028
3. Amira, P. O., Daramola, A. S., Muoghalu, C. E., & Ojo, O. B. (2020). Comparative studies on phytochemical screening and in vitro antioxidant activities of aqueous extracts of anacardium occidentale leaves and nuts. European Journal of Biology and Biotechnology, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbio.2020.1.4.49
4. Bancroft, J. D. (2008). Theory and practice of histological techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences.
5. Baptista, A. B., Sarandy, M. M., Gonçalves, R. V., Novaes, R. D., Da Costa, C. G., Leite, J. P. V., & Peluzio, M. D. C. G. (2020). Antioxidant and Ant-Inflammatory Effects of Anacardium occidentale L. and Anacardium microcarpum D. Extracts on the Liver of IL-10 Knockout Mice. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2020(1). https://doi org/10.1155/2020/3054521
6. Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., & Bruns, D. E. (2011). Tietz TextbookofClinicalChemistryandMolecularDiagnostics - E-Book: Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics - E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
7. Dada, I. B. O., Agesin, A. M., & Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, P.M.B 1019, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria. (2022).
8. COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF SOME SELECTED TROPICAL LEAVES EXTRACTS. In Coast, J. Sch. Sci (Vols. 4–2, pp. 801–813) [Journal-article].
9. Kiliś-Pstrusińska, K., & Wiela-Hojeńska, A. (2021). Nephrotoxicity of herbal products in Europe—A review of an underestimated problem. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(8), 4132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijms22084132.
10. Laasya, T. S., Thakur, S., Poduri, R., & Joshi, G. (2020). Current insights toward kidney injury: Decrypting the dual role and mechanism involved of herbal drugs in inducing kidney injury and its treatment. Current Research in Biotechnology, 2, 161–175. https://doi org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2020.11.002
11. Mazani, M., Rezagholizadeh, L., Shamsi, S., Mahdavifard, S., Ojarudi, M., Salimnejad, R., & Salimi, A. (2020). Protection of CCl4-induced hepatic and renal damage by linalool. Drug and Chemical Toxicology, 45(3), 963– 971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2020.1792487
12. OECD. (2022). OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS Acute Oral Toxicity – Up-and-Down- Procedure (UDP). In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals.
13. Salehi, B., Gültekin-Özgüven, M., Kırkın, C., Özçelik, B., Morais-Braga, M. F. B., Pereira Carneiro, J. N., Bezerra, C. F., Da Silva, T. G., Coutinho, H. D. M., Bioactive Research & Innovation Food Manufac. Indust. Trade Ltd., Laboratory of Applied Mycology of Cariri, Laboratory of Planning and Synthesis of Drugs, Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Department of Agronomy, State University of Ponta Grossa, Department of Medical Biology, Department of Food Processing, Department of Botany, Zabol Medicinal Plants Research Center, . . .
14. Department of Clinical Oncology. (2019). Anacardium plants: chemical, nutritional composition and biotechnological applications. Biomolecules, 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9090465
15. Yoshioka, H., Usuda, H., Fukuishi, N., Nonogaki, T., & Onosaka, S. (2016). Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Mice Is Prevented by Pretreatment with Zinc Sulfate. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 39(6), 1042–1046. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb b16-00078.

This is a text version generated from the article. For the formatted version of record (with original tables & figures), download the PDF →