Journal of Clinical PediatricsISSN 2995-6560 · Open access · Directive Publications
  1. Home
  2. Journal of Clinical Pediatrics
  3. Research
Research 🔓 Open Access CC BY 4.0

Factors Affecting Adverse Effects Of Methotrexate In Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

  • Hanan Abushwereb1 ✉
    Hanan AbushwerebCorresponding author
    • 1 Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy Department, University of Tripoli, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tripoli, Libya
    More articles by this author →
  • Fatma Ertimi1
    Fatma Ertimi
    • 1 Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy Department, University of Tripoli, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tripoli, Libya
    More articles by this author →
  • Souad Hashad2
    Souad Hashad
    • 2 Pediatric Rheumatology Department, Al-Jala Hospital, Tripoli, Libya
    More articles by this author →
Show affiliations (2)
  1. 1Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy Department, University of Tripoli, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tripoli, Libya
  2. 2Pediatric Rheumatology Department, Al-Jala Hospital, Tripoli, Libya

Published

DOI10.52338/jocp.2026.5782 Vol 17 · 2026 ⏱ 9 min read
⬇ Download PDF

Abstract

BackgroundJuvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is treated with methotrexate (MTX), but its adverse effects can lead to treatment discontinuation. This study investigates the incidence and risk factors of MTX side effects in JIA patients.

MethodsA retrospective study of 123 JIA patients (aged 1-18 years) treated with MTX between 2002 and 2020 was conducted.

Results78.9% of patients experienced MTX side effects. Younger patients (<5 years) had higher rates of upper respiratory tract infections. Tablet-administered MTX was associated with increased vomiting, mouth ulcers, low platelet counts, and anemia. Concomitant treatments with MTX were linked to higher vomiting and abdominal pain. Longer treatment duration correlated with elevated liver enzymes and vomiting. Patients with poor compliance had a significantly higher incidence of side effects (67%) compared to those with good compliance (33%).

ConclusionsMTX treatment for JIA is associated with significant side effects, varying by patient factors and treatment methods. Understanding these risks is critical for optimizing treatment and minimizing negative outcomes. Further research is needed to explore strategies for mitigating adverse effects and improving patient compliance.

1 Introduction#

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in children and teens, characterized by joint pain and inflammation. The international standard, established by the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR), categorizes JIA into seven mutually exclusive subtypes, including oligoarticular, polyarticular, systemic JIA, psoriatic JIA, and enthesitis-related JIA[1, 2]. Symptoms vary widely but may include high fever, rash, and enlarged lymph nodes, particularly in the systemic subtype[3]. JIA can also affect the eye, causing uveitis, the most common cause of blindness in these patients.

Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of JIA management and is the recommended first-line conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD), managing arthritis symptoms and preventing long-term joint damage[4-6]. Symptom improvement usually occurs within 6–12 weeks[7]. MTX's therapeutic efficacy stems from multiple complex mechanisms, positioning it as the global standard for rheumatoid diseases due to its efficacy and low cost[8, 9]. MTX inhibits dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), an enzyme essential for converting dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate (THF). This suppresses the immune response by reducing the production of purines and pyrimidines, which are vital for DNA and RNA synthesis in rapidly proliferating immune cells involved in JIA[9, 10]. MTX also increases extracellular adenosine levels, which exerts powerful anti-inflammatory effects[9]. Its efficacy is also attributed to the regulation of inflammatory signaling, promotion of bone protection, and maintenance of overall immune system function[9].

Despite its efficacy, MTX is associated with a wide range of side effects that pose a significant barrier to successful treatment. The necessity of using a folate antagonist requires co-administration of folic acid supplementation to mitigate common side effects like nausea and stomatitis (mouth ulcers)[11]. MTX can cause various adverse effects, including; Common Gastrointestinal Symptoms such as nausea (occurring in about 10% of patients), stomatitis (up to one-third of patients), abdominal pain, and vomiting. Serious toxicities as liver problems (hepatotoxicity), lung problems (pulmonary toxicity), and hematologic toxicity (low blood cell counts, including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and megaloblastic anemia)[11].

MTX's role has evolved due to the introduction of biologic DMARDs, but it remains the preferred initial therapy[11, 12]. The management challenge now lies in minimizing adverse effects to ensure patient adherence. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of MTX exhibit significant intersubject variability[15-17]. This variability is influenced by multiple factors, including dose-dependent absorption, body surface area, renal function, volume of distribution, route of administration, and genetic mutations[13-17].

While studies on adults with rheumatoid arthritis have identified that age, body weight, creatinine clearance, gender, dose, and fasting status significantly affect MTX absorption[13, 14], data in the pediatric population show specific differences—for instance, pediatrics experience a decline in absorption at doses above 40 mg/m2, whereas adults experience it above 80 mg/m2[18]. Additionally, children may face difficulties in treatment compliance and require specific tools to predict methotrexate intolerance[19-20]. Given the frequency and significance of adverse effects, and the need for optimal, long-term adherence in JIA patients. Thus, this study aims to analyze the adverse effects of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, identify factors influencing their development, evaluate the treatment's long-term safety, and assess its impact on patient compliance.

2 Methodology#

The study involving 123 patients aged 1-18 years with juvenile arthritis (JIA) from 2002 to 2020 at Al-Jala Pediatric Hospital examined the adverse effects of MTX treatment. The study assessed gastrointestinal, hepatic, hematologic, infectious, and mouth ulcer effects. Liver function tests and blood account tests were also recorded at least one month after treatment initiation and every three to four months thereafter. Patients used other medications combined with MTX to control the disease.

2.1 Statistical analysis#

The study used descriptive statistics, chi-square test, student's t-test, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to analyze the effects of methotrexate on patients. The results were presented in tables and graphs, and statistical significance was defined as a p-value of less than or equal to 0.05. The study assessed the association between categorical variables and the duration of mean survival.

3 Results#

3.1 The sample's basic epidemiological characteristic is as follows#

The study included 123 patients: 78 female (63.4%) and 45 male (36.6%) as illustrated in (Table 1). The mean age at treatment start was 7.6 years (S.D ± 4) (Table 1). Patients were classified based on the ILAR criteria (Fig. 1), This found that 43 patients have poly arthritis (35%), systemic arthritis 19 patients (15.4%), oligo arthritis 17 patients (13.8%), 5 patients with psoriatic arthritis (4.1%), patient with ERA 6 (4.9%), 16 patients with uveitis (13%), and 17 patients are diagnosed with other diseases (13.8%).The mean of the doses of methotrexate used was 13.6 mg/m2/week (S.D ±2.4) (Table 1). In addition, 93 of patients administered MTX subcutaneously (represent 76%) while only 30 patients taken the drug orally (24%) (Table 1). The mean of duration of treatment was 3.9 years (S.D ±2.2) (Table 1), whereas other treatment used with MTX was recorded in 72 patients (58.6%). In the meantime, 25 of patients (20%) were treated with prednisolone, whereas 12 of patients were treated with naproxen (10%), 7 patients (6%) were treated with naproxen and prednisolone, 28 patients treated with biology and 51 patients on MTX alone (41%) (Fig.1).

Figure 1 Different types of juvenile idiopathic arthritis according to gender.Download

3.2 The frequency and type of adverse drug reactions#

Ninety-seven (n= 97, 78.9%) patients experienced side effects during MTX treatment, with 35% experiencing vomiting and 34% experiencing high liver enzyme. The least common type was pneumonia infection (4%), with a mean duration of 1.3 years for adverse reactions (Table 2).

Table 1 Displays the age, sex, doses, duration, and administration routes of MTX treatment in relation to the number of patients with JIA.

Table 1 Displays the age, sex, doses, duration, and administration routes of MTX treatment in relation to the number of patients with JIA.
Item NPercentMean SD
Age group >5 years 6-12 years 13-18 years37 % 49 % 14%7.6
Sex Male Female45 7836.6% 63.4%
Doses 10 (mg/m2) 11-15 (mg/m2) 16 (mg/m2)25% 70% 5%13.6 mg/m2S.D ±2.4
MTX treatment duration Less than 1 year 1- 3 years Above 3 years10 % 39 % 51%3.9 yearS.D ±2.2
Route of administration Tablet Subcutanious30 9324% 76%

Table 2 Includes general information on the number of JIA patients who experienced side effects, those who continued treatment, and those who discontinued treatment.

Table 2 Includes general information on the number of JIA patients who experienced side effects, those who continued treatment, and those who discontinued treatment.
ParametersPercent
Patients having adverse effects Yes No79% 21%
Patients on MTX Stay on Treatment Discontinue it59% 41%
No. of Side effects One side effect Two or more ≥ Two side effect
Upper respiratory tract infection < 5 Yrs 24% 5 -10 Yrs 20 > 10 Yrs 2%
The highest side effect Vomiting High liver enzyme Pneumonia35% 34% 4%

3.3 Factors associated with adverse reactions are#

This study identified several demographic and treatment-related variables that significantly influenced the incidence and type of adverse reactions experienced by Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) patients treated with Methotrexate (MTX). The factors investigated included age, gender, dose, route, treatment duration, and concomitant medications (as summarized in Table 1).

3.4 Demographic Factors (Age and Gender)#

  • Age at Treatment Initiation: A significant association was found between the patient's age at MTX initiation and the occurrence of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Patients under 5 years old experienced URTIs more than twice per year during MTX treatment compared to older patients.
  • Gender: No statistically significant association was observed between gender and the overall incidence of adverse effects.

3.6 Route of Administration#

Table 3 and 4 summarize the association between concomitant treatments/treatment duration and specific adverse effects of Methotrexate (MTX).

Table 3 The route of MTX administration showed a clear association with Gastrointestinal (GIT) side effects and hematological adverse reactions:

Table 3 The route of MTX administration showed a clear association with Gastrointestinal (GIT) side effects and hematological adverse reactions:
Side EffectOral (Tablet) RouteSubcutaneous (Injection) RouteFindings
Vomiting51.2%26.8%Oral administration resulted in significantly higher rates of vomiting.
Mouth Ulcers (Stomatitis)24.0%8.5%Oral administration resulted in significantly higher rates of mouth ulcers.

Table 4 summarizes the percentage of patients experiencing vomiting when MTX was administered alone versus in combination with other common treatments for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA).

Table 4 summarizes the percentage of patients experiencing vomiting when MTX was administered alone versus in combination with other common treatments for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA).
Concomitant Treatment GroupVomiting Incidence
Patients taking other treatments (Overall)75 %
Prednisolone only32 %
Naproxen and Prednisolone14.3 %
Biologics28.6 %
No other treatment (MTX monotherapy)33.3 %

The study found a significant association indicating that the risk of elevated liver enzymes increases substantially with MTX treatment lasting more than one year (36.9% vs. 8.3%) (Table 5).

Table 5 Summarizes the significant association found between the duration of MTX treatment and the incidence of high liver enzymes.

Table 5 Summarizes the significant association found between the duration of MTX treatment and the incidence of high liver enzymes.
Duration of MTX TreatmentHigh Liver Enzymes Incidence (Hepatotoxicity)Vomiting Incidence
Less than 1 year8.3%8.3%
More than 1 year36.9%Not specified in data

3.7 Discontinuation of treatment and patient’s compliance#

The outcomes for the 40.7% of patients who discontinued MTX after a mean follow-up duration of 3.9 years were summarized in table 6. Data is based on 26 patients whose reasons for stopping were analysed. Reasons for discontinuation included adverse effects (52%), remission (24%), bad compliance (16%), and ineffectiveness (8%) in 26 patients. The most common adverse effect was GIT adverse effect in these 26 patients. The Kaplan Meier method was used to compare the treatment duration until discontinuation due to side effects between methotrexate alone and other treatments. the MTX and biology treatment showed the highest survival rate, with the probability of continuing treatment up to 8 years (20%), 8% (MTX alone), 10% MTX with naproxen, 15% (MTX and prednisolone), and 15% MTX with naproxen and prednisolone. In table 7, Patients with poor compliance experienced higher adverse effects (67%) during treatment compared to those with good compliance (33%).

Table 6 Reasons for MTX Treatment Discontinuation.

Table 6 Reasons for MTX Treatment Discontinuation.
Reason for DiscontinuationPercentage of Discontinued Patients (n=26)
Adverse Effects52 %
Remission24 %
Bad Compliance16 %
Ineffectiveness8 %

This table summarizes the treatment survival (continuation) probability at 8 years based on treatment regimen, and the relationship between patient compliance and adverse effects.

Table 7 Treatment Continuation Probability and Compliance Effects

Table 7 Treatment Continuation Probability and Compliance Effects
FactorDetailProbability/Incidence
Probability of Continuing MTX (Survival Rate) at 8 YearsMTX with Biologic therapy20% (Highest)
MTX with Prednisolone15%
MTX with Naproxen and Prednisolone15%
MTX with Naproxen10%
MTX alone8% (Lowest)
Adverse Effects based on Patient CompliancePatients with Poor Compliance67% incidence of adverse effects
Patients with Good Compliance33% incidence of adverse effects
Figure 2 Compares the severity of MTX side effects depending on route of administration.Download
Figure 3 Comparison of the side effects of MTX with concurrent medication drugs.Download
Figure 4 Depicts the MTX remission rate, side effects, poor compliance, and ineffectiveness, as shown in the accompanying figure.Download
Figure 5 The effect of gender on adverse drug reaction.Download
Figure 6 The strength of side effects by duration of treatment.Download
Figure 7 Shows patient compliance.Download
Figure 8 Shows patient compliance.Download
Figure 9 Time elapsed from initiation of MTX treatment to discontinuation. Analyzed with the Kaplan Meier method different line colors represent MTX alone and MTX with concomitant treatment.Download

The different coloured lines represent the MTX regimen the patient was receiving. The higher a curve is, the better the "survival" (i.e., the longer the patient continued treatment).

The Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve showing the probability of patients continuing Methotrexate (MTX) treatment over time, which means it tracks the duration of treatment until discontinuation.

At 4 years, 68% of patients on biological treatment, 50% on MTX alone, and 25% on Prednisolone are still receiving treatment. By 8 years, the figures drop to approximately 20% for biological treatment and 8% for MTX alone, correlating with survival rates of 20% and 8% respectively (Fig. 9).

The graph visually reinforces the finding that the addition of biologic agents is the strongest factor in maintaining patients on MTX treatment over the long term, while the combination with prednisolone has the highest discontinuation risk.

Table 8 The differences in dosage mean between patients with side effects and those without.

Table 8 The differences in dosage mean between patients with side effects and those without.
Adverse effectsNMeanS. DtP value
VomitingYes No43 8013.8 13.32.27390 2.593461.0960.276
NauseaYes No13 11013.4 13.73.29181 2.47760-0.2720.786
Abdominal painYes No32 9113.5 13.62.41494 2.56248-0.2780.782
Mouth ulcerYes No15 10813.4 13.61.98969 2.54055-0.3030.763
DiarrheaYes No6 11714.3 13.61.11430 2.502851.4030.825
URTIYes No20 10313.2 13.63.54467 2.49102-0.6290.531
PneumoniaYes No5 11814.4 13.76.94082 2.439780.2360.825
Herpes zosterYes No6 11712.7 13.72.29819 2.46273-0.9150.362
Chicken poxYes No10 11312.1 13.74.13382 2.36882-1.2160.253
High Liver EnzymeYes No42 8114.3 13.32.95909 2.569381.9130.058
Low WBCYes No8 11514.1 13.61.86006 2.49519.5460.586
Low plateletYes No8 11514.0 13.61.86006 2.495190.5460.586

This table presents the results of t-tests comparing the mean Methotrexate (MTX) dosage between two groups for various adverse effects: patients who experienced the side effect (Yes) and those who did not (No).

MTX dosage was not a statistically significant factor in the incidence of any of the tested adverse effects, with one notable exception that approached significance.

The statistical analysis performed using the t-test indicated that the mean MTX dose (measured in mg/m2/week, though units are not specified) did not significantly differ between patients who experienced adverse effects and those who did not for nearly all categories tested. For common side effects such as vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain, mouth ulcers, diarrhoea, upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), and various haematological effects (low WBC, low platelets), the P value was consistently above the standard significance level of 0.05 (ranging from 0.253 to 0.825). This suggests that varying the dose within the range used in this study did not increase the likelihood of developing these side effects.

The only adverse effect that showed a near-significant difference was High Liver Enzymes, with a P value of 0.058. While this technically remains above the 0.05 threshold, it is very close and suggests a trend toward a higher mean dose in the group experiencing liver enzyme elevation (14.3) compared to the group without (13.3). This near-significance highlights that dose may be a factor in hepatotoxicity, though further study is warranted to confirm this relationship. In summary, the study demonstrates that the incidence of most MTX adverse effects is largely independent of the mean weekly dose administered.

4 Discussion#

The study investigates the use of methotrexate (MTX) in treating rheumatoid arthritis (JIA) in pediatric and adolescent patients. As known MTX's mechanisms include adenosine signaling modulation, cytokine network alteration, reactive oxygen species generation, and suppression of High-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1)- alarmin. Despite potential to attenuate immune surveillance, MTX remains a key treatment. Risk factors for treatment toxicity and adverse effects and longer therapy duration remains a crucial issue.

This study reveals that female patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have a higher percentage of adverse effects than male patients, which is consistent with previous studies. The age at presentation for JIA is similar to other studies, with a median age of 6.4 years. The most common types of JIA are polyarthritis and oligo arthritis. The study examines the frequency and types of adverse effects associated with methotrexate (MTX) treatment in Libyan patients and describes treatment survival and adverse effect occurrence in children receiving MTX for JIA. There is a lack of published evidence on the importance of methotrexate dose and route of administration on both its efficacy and adverse events in children with JIA. The overall incidence of adverse effects is high, with more than half of the patients reporting one or more side effects from MTX. The most frequent side effects observed in this study were elevated liver enzymes (34%), vomiting (35%), and abdominal pain (26%). This is consistent with other research reporting occurrences between 21% and 73%. The incidence of GI discomfort and elevated liver enzymes is high, with a high level of GI disturbance caused by MTX.

Haematological abnormalities described in this study include significantly decreased blood counts: anemia (12%), low WBC (6.5%), and low platelets (6.5%). Methotrexate hematological complications are known, but every study agrees on reporting a low frequency of these events. MTX is associated with the development of opportunistic infections, with the incidence of pneumonia infection being the lowest at 4%. However, the overall infection rate in this study is considered higher compared to others[21-22].

MTX can also be effective in treating chronic JIA-associated uveitis[23]. MTX and biologic agents are commonly prescribed for JIA treatment, with MTX being a conventional DMARD that suppresses immune response by inhibiting nucleotide synthesis[11]. Biologic agents, such as TNF inhibitors and non-TNF biologics, are reserved for specific cases and can reduce disease activity and improve remission when combined with MTX[24]. However, they have similar adverse event rates compared to MTX alone[11,24]. Vaccinations in JIA patients should be considered based on individual risk and benefit assessments[25]. The study provides valuable insights into the adverse effects of MTX treatment in JIA, suggesting future research should explore long-term safety and effectiveness of interventions to mitigate side effects. The findings could inform treatment decisions and patient education.

5 Conclusion#

Side effects of methotrexate (MTX) are a major concern for patients, leading to discontinuation of many treatments. Contributing factors include dosing errors, metabolic syndrome, hypoalbuminemia, respiratory tract infection, lack of folic acid supplementation, and concomitant use of interacting medications. Combining MTX with TNF or non-TNF biologics reduces disease activity and improves remission compared with MTX monotherapy. Overall adverse events and discontinuation rates were similar between treatment groups. The most common adverse effect leading to discontinuation was Gastrointestinal (GIT) adverse effects. The study focused primarily on adverse effects, but including measures of treatment effectiveness and patient quality of life would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of MTX.

5.1 Limitation#

limitations of the study, such as its retrospective design, the potential for recall bias, or the relatively small sample size. It also lacks a control group, may not fully capture the complex interactions between MTX and other drugs. Study limitations may affect the ability to determine causality and control for confounding variables.

Declarations

◎Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Article information

  1. Published
cc

Copyright © 2026 Hanan Abushwereb. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. CC BY 4.0 · Corrections policy

Cite this articleAbushwereb H, Ertimi F, Hashad S. Factors Affecting Adverse Effects Of Methotrexate In Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Journal of Clinical Pediatrics. 2026;17. doi: 10.52338/jocp.2026.5782
PDF JATS XML

References 25#

  1. 1

    Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390-392.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  2. 2

    Ravelli A, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet. 2007;369(9563):767-778.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  3. 3

    Thon V, Cinek O. Oligoarticular and polyarticular JIA: epidemiology and pathogenesis. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12(11):1083-1088.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  4. 4

    Giannini EH, Brewer EJ, Kuzmina N, et al. Methotrexate in resistant juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: results of the U.S.A.-U.S.S.R. double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(16):1043-1049.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  5. 5

    Favalli EG, Biggioggero M, Meroni PL. Methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the biologic era: still an "anchor" drug?. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(11):1102-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.08.026.

    DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  6. 6

    Bedoui Y, Guillot X, Sélambarom J, et al. Methotrexate an Old Drug with New Tricks. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5023. Published 2019 Oct 10. doi:10.3390/ijms20205023.

    DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  7. 7

    Godfrey C, Sweeney K, Miller K, Hamilton R, Kremer J. The population pharmacokinetics of long-term methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46(4):369-376. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998. t 01-1- 00790.x.

    DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  8. 8

    Zhao Z, Hua Z, Luo X, et al. Application and pharmacological mechanism of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022; 150:113074. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113074.

    DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  9. 9

    Cronstein BN, Aune TM. Methotrexate and its mechanisms of action in inflammatory arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16 (9):515-527.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  10. 10

    Weinstein A, Manzi S, Methotrexate: Mechanism of Action and Clinical Use. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(12):988-995.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  11. 11

    Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Methotrexate in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Advice and Recommendations from the MARAJIA Expert Consensus Meeting. Rheumatol Ther. 2018;5(2):161-178.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  12. 12

    Guzman J, Oen K, Tucker LB, et al. The outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children managed with contemporary treatments: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1854-1860.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  13. 13

    Jansen G, The Antirheumatic Action of Methotrexate: The Role of Pharmacogenetics, Membrane Transport, and Metabolism. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2004;33(5): S39-S45.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  14. 14

    Rodenburg K, Kilsdonk E, van den Bosch OFC, et al. Factors influencing the oral bioavailability of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(5):824-835.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  15. 15

    Raja A, Anic K. Methotrexate and its therapeutic efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of genetic variants. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2018; 11:21-30.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  16. 16

    Klamp W, Wagner T, Methotrexate pharmacokinetics and route of administration in rheumatology. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22(2):S45-S49.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  17. 17

    Ferrara G, Mastrangelo G, Barone P, et al. Methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: advice and recommendations from the MARAJIA expert consensus meeting. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018;16(1):46. Published 2018 Jul 11. doi:10.1186/s12969-018-0255-8.

    DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  18. 18

    Yang Y, Liu Z, Chen J, Wang X, Jiao Z, Wang Z. Factors influencing methotrexate pharmacokinetics highlight the need for individualized dose adjustment: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;80(1):11-37. doi:10.1007/s00228-023-03579-0.

    DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  19. 19

    Livermore P. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: updated guide to administering methotrexate. Nurs Child Young People. 2014;26(1):26-29. doi:10.7748/ncyp2014.02.26.1.26. e393.

    DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  20. 20

    Donahue, K.E., Schulman, E.R., Gartlehner, G. et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Combining MTX with Biologic Drug Therapy Versus Either MTX or Biologics Alone for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis in Adults: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 34, 2232–2245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05230-0.

    DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  21. 21

    Smilutė G, Stropuviene K, Infectious complications in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with methotrexate. Medicina (Kaunas). 2012;48(1):15-20.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  22. 22

    Ringsberg V, Berntson L, Infections in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients on methotrexate: a follow-up study of the Swedish patient cohort. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2015; 13:17.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  23. 23

    Rabinovich CE, Methotrexate and JIA-associated uveitis: An update on efficacy and safety. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2011;9(1):15.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  24. 24

    Lovell DJ, Giannini EH, Reiff A, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of etanercept in children with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: results after 10 years. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(9):2494-2503.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

  25. 25

    Pringsheim T, Vaccination of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence. Pediatrics. 22005;116(3): e600-e617.

    PubMedGoogle Scholar↩ Back to text

Cite this article

Share this article

Figure

Table